University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Ann Med. 2011 Dec;43(8):594-605. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2011.625971. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
BACKGROUND. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are associated with poor upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tolerability and increased ulcer risk, but patient adherence to gastroprotective co-therapy is frequently inadequate. A fixed-dose combination of enteric-coated naproxen 500 mg and immediate-release esomeprazole magnesium 20 mg was evaluated: efficacy is reported by Hochberg et al. (Curr Med Res Opin 2011;27:1243-53); tolerability findings are reported here. PATIENTS AND METHODS. In two 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase III studies (PN400-307 and PN400-309), patients aged ≥ 50 years with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis randomly (2:2:1) received naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium BID, celecoxib 200 mg QD, or placebo. Tolerability end-points included: modified Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment (mSODA); heartburn severity; and UGI adverse events (AEs). RESULTS. Overall, 619 (PN400-307) and 615 (PN400-309) patients were randomized; mSODA scores improved (baseline to week 12) in each group, with no significant treatment differences between naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium and celecoxib (95% CIs: PN400-307: -0.4, 1.9; PN400-309: -1.8, 0.6). Naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium-treated patients reported significantly more heartburn-free days versus celecoxib (95% CIs: PN400-307: 2.1, 12.7; PN400-309: 2.5, 13.4). UGI AE incidence (PN400-307: 17.3%; PN400-309: 20.3%) was similar between treatment groups. UGI AEs resulted in few discontinuations (< 4%, either study). CONCLUSIONS. Naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium has comparable UGI tolerability to celecoxib in patients with osteoarthritis.
非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)与较差的上胃肠道(UGI)耐受性和增加的溃疡风险相关,但患者对胃保护联合治疗的依从性常常不足。一种萘普生 500mg 与埃索美拉唑镁 20mg 的肠溶片固定剂量组合被进行了评估:其疗效由 Hochberg 等人报道(Curr Med Res Opin 2011;27:1243-53);这里报告其耐受性发现。
在两项为期 12 周的双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心、III 期研究(PN400-307 和 PN400-309)中,年龄≥50 岁的有症状膝骨关节炎患者随机(2:2:1)接受萘普生/埃索美拉唑镁 BID、塞来昔布 200mg QD 或安慰剂治疗。耐受性终点包括:改良消化不良严重程度评估(mSODA);烧心严重程度;以及 UGI 不良事件(AE)。
总体而言,619 例(PN400-307)和 615 例(PN400-309)患者被随机分组;各组 mSODA 评分均在基线至第 12 周改善,萘普生/埃索美拉唑镁与塞来昔布之间无显著治疗差异(95%CI:PN400-307:-0.4,1.9;PN400-309:-1.8,0.6)。与塞来昔布相比,萘普生/埃索美拉唑镁治疗的患者报告有更多的烧心无天数(95%CI:PN400-307:2.1,12.7;PN400-309:2.5,13.4)。两组治疗组 UGI AE 发生率(PN400-307:17.3%;PN400-309:20.3%)相似。UGI AE 导致的停药率较低(<4%,两项研究均如此)。
在骨关节炎患者中,萘普生/埃索美拉唑镁与塞来昔布的 UGI 耐受性相当。