Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Diabetes. 2012 Jan;61(1):179-86. doi: 10.2337/db11-0670. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
A subset of children develops persistent insulin autoantibodies (IAA; almost always as the only islet autoantibody) without evidence of progression to diabetes. The aim of the current study was the development and characterization of the performance of a nonradioactive fluid phase IAA assay in relation to standard IAA radioassay. We developed a nonradioactive IAA assay where bivalent IAA cross-link two insulin moieties in a fluid phase. The serum samples positive for anti-islet autoantibodies from 150 newly diagnosed patients with diabetes (Barbara Davis Center plus Diabetes Autoantibody Standardization Program [DASP] workshop) and 70 prediabetic subjects who were followed to diabetes were studied. In addition, sequential samples from 64 nondiabetic subjects who were persistently IAA(+) were analyzed. With 99th percentile of specificity, the new assay with the technology from Meso Scale Discovery Company (MSD-IAA) detects as positive 61% (61 of 100) of new-onset patients and 80% (56 of 70) of prediabetic patients compared with our current fluid phase micro-IAA radioassay (mIAA; 44 and 74%, respectively). In addition, MSD-IAA demonstrated better sensitivity than our mIAA from blinded DASP workshop (68 vs. 56% with the same 99% specificity). Of 64 IAA(+) nondiabetic subjects, 25% (8 of 32) who had only IAA and thus the low risk for progression to diabetes were positive with MSD-IAA assay. In contrast, 100% (32 of 32) high-risk children (IAA plus other islet autoantibodies) were positive with MSD-IAA. The IAA detectable by radioassay, but not MSD-IAA, were usually of lower affinity compared with the IAA of the high-risk children. These data suggest that a subset of IAA with current radioassay (not MSD-IAA) represents biologic false positives in terms of autoimmunity leading to diabetes. We hypothesize that factors related to the mechanism of loss of tolerance leading to diabetes determine high affinity and MSD-IAA reactivity.
一组儿童产生持续的胰岛素自身抗体(IAA;几乎总是作为唯一的胰岛自身抗体),但没有进展为糖尿病的证据。本研究的目的是开发和描述一种非放射性液相 IAA 测定法与标准 IAA 放射测定法的性能关系。我们开发了一种非放射性 IAA 测定法,其中二价 IAA 将两个胰岛素部分交联在液相中。从 150 名新诊断为糖尿病的患者(Barbara Davis 中心加糖尿病自身抗体标准化计划 [DASP] 研讨会)和 70 名处于糖尿病前期的患者的抗胰岛自身抗体阳性血清样本中进行了研究,这些患者随后发展为糖尿病。此外,还分析了 64 名持续 IAA(+)的非糖尿病患者的连续样本。在 99%特异性的情况下,新的 MSD 公司(Meso Scale Discovery Company,MSD)的技术(MSD-IAA)检测到 61%(100 例中的 61 例)新发病例和 80%(70 例中的 56 例)的糖尿病前期患者为阳性,而我们目前的液相微 IAA 放射测定法(mIAA;分别为 44%和 74%)。此外,MSD-IAA 比我们的盲 DASP 研讨会的 mIAA 显示出更好的敏感性(68%与相同的 99%特异性相比为 56%)。在 64 名 IAA(+)非糖尿病患者中,只有 IAA(因此进展为糖尿病的风险较低)的 25%(32 名中的 8 名)为 MSD-IAA 检测阳性。相比之下,100%(32 名中的 32 名)高风险儿童(IAA 加其他胰岛自身抗体)均为 MSD-IAA 阳性。用放射测定法检测到的 IAA,但不能用 MSD-IAA 检测到的 IAA,通常与高风险儿童的 IAA 相比亲和力较低。这些数据表明,目前放射测定法(非 MSD-IAA)检测到的 IAA 子集在导致糖尿病的自身免疫方面代表生物学假阳性。我们假设与导致糖尿病的耐受丧失机制相关的因素决定了高亲和力和 MSD-IAA 反应性。