Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚与咪达唑仑对严重创伤性脑损伤的脑微透析作用。

Cerebral microdialysis effects of propofol versus midazolam in severe traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation 1, Hôpital de Pontchaillou, Cedex, France.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2012 Apr 10;29(6):1105-10. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1817. Epub 2012 Feb 3.

Abstract

Propofol, an anesthetic agent acting as an analogue of vitamin E, has been advocated to be an ideal neuroprotective agent both in animal models and in clinical practice, due to its positive effects on oxidative stress. Nevertheless, no studies have compared this agent to another sedative agent used for sedation after traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objective was to compare the effects of propofol to midazolam on cerebral biomarkers at the acute phase of severe TBI patients. Thirty patients aged 35±18 years were prospectively randomized to receive propofol or midazolam and 29 were analyzed (n=15 for propofol, and n=14 for midazolam). A cerebral microdialysis catheter was used to measure the lactate:pyruvate (L:P) ratio, glutamate, glycerol, and glucose for 72 h. No difference between groups was observed for the L:P ratio (time effect p=0.201, treatment effect p=0.401, time×treatment interaction p=0.101). Similarly, no difference was observed for glutamate (time effect p=0.930, treatment effect p=0.651, time×treatment interaction p=0.353), glycerol (time effect p=0.223, treatment effect p=0.922, time×treatment interaction p=0.308), or glucose (time effect p=0.116, treatment effect p=0.088, time×treatment interaction p=0.235). These results do not support a difference between propofol and midazolam for sedation for the cerebral metabolic profile in severe TBI.

摘要

丙泊酚,一种维生素 E 类似物的麻醉剂,因其对氧化应激的积极作用,已被倡导作为动物模型和临床实践中理想的神经保护剂。然而,尚无研究将该药物与用于创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后镇静的另一种镇静剂进行比较。本研究旨在比较丙泊酚和咪达唑仑对严重 TBI 患者急性期脑生物标志物的影响。35±18 岁的 30 例患者前瞻性随机分为丙泊酚或咪达唑仑组,29 例患者进行分析(丙泊酚组 n=15,咪达唑仑组 n=14)。使用脑微透析导管测量乳酸:丙酮酸(L:P)比值、谷氨酸、甘油和葡萄糖,持续 72 小时。两组之间的 L:P 比值无差异(时间效应 p=0.201,治疗效应 p=0.401,时间×治疗相互作用 p=0.101)。同样,谷氨酸(时间效应 p=0.930,治疗效应 p=0.651,时间×治疗相互作用 p=0.353)、甘油(时间效应 p=0.223,治疗效应 p=0.922,时间×治疗相互作用 p=0.308)或葡萄糖(时间效应 p=0.116,治疗效应 p=0.088,时间×治疗相互作用 p=0.235)也无差异。这些结果不支持丙泊酚和咪达唑仑在镇静严重 TBI 患者的脑代谢谱方面存在差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验