Cancer Chemoprotection Program, Linus Pauling Institute, 307 Linus Pauling Science Center, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR 97331, USA.
Clin Epigenetics. 2011;3(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1868-7083-3-4. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
Genomic instability is a common feature of cancer etiology. This provides an avenue for therapeutic intervention, since cancer cells are more susceptible than normal cells to DNA damaging agents. However, there is growing evidence that the epigenetic mechanisms that impact DNA methylation and histone status also contribute to genomic instability. The DNA damage response, for example, is modulated by the acetylation status of histone and non-histone proteins, and by the opposing activities of histone acetyltransferase and histone deacetylase (HDAC) enzymes. Many HDACs overexpressed in cancer cells have been implicated in protecting such cells from genotoxic insults. Thus, HDAC inhibitors, in addition to unsilencing tumor suppressor genes, also can silence DNA repair pathways, inactivate non-histone proteins that are required for DNA stability, and induce reactive oxygen species and DNA double-strand breaks. This review summarizes how dietary phytochemicals that affect the epigenome also can trigger DNA damage and repair mechanisms. Where such data is available, examples are cited from studies in vitro and in vivo of polyphenols, organosulfur/organoselenium compounds, indoles, sesquiterpene lactones, and miscellaneous agents such as anacardic acid. Finally, by virtue of their genetic and epigenetic mechanisms, cancer chemopreventive agents are being redefined as chemo- or radio-sensitizers. A sustained DNA damage response coupled with insufficient repair may be a pivotal mechanism for apoptosis induction in cancer cells exposed to dietary phytochemicals. Future research, including appropriate clinical investigation, should clarify these emerging concepts in the context of both genetic and epigenetic mechanisms dysregulated in cancer, and the pros and cons of specific dietary intervention strategies.
基因组不稳定性是癌症发病机制的一个共同特征。这为治疗干预提供了一个途径,因为癌细胞比正常细胞更容易受到 DNA 损伤剂的影响。然而,越来越多的证据表明,影响 DNA 甲基化和组蛋白状态的表观遗传机制也有助于基因组不稳定性。例如,DNA 损伤反应受到组蛋白和非组蛋白蛋白乙酰化状态的调节,以及组蛋白乙酰转移酶和组蛋白去乙酰化酶 (HDAC) 酶的相反活性的调节。在癌细胞中过度表达的许多 HDAC 已被牵连到保护这些细胞免受遗传毒性损伤。因此,除了沉默肿瘤抑制基因外,HDAC 抑制剂还可以沉默 DNA 修复途径,失活 DNA 稳定性所需的非组蛋白蛋白,并诱导活性氧和 DNA 双链断裂。这篇综述总结了影响表观基因组的膳食植物化学物质如何也能引发 DNA 损伤和修复机制。在有此类数据的情况下,引用了在体外和体内研究多酚、有机硫/有机硒化合物、吲哚、倍半萜内酯和诸如漆树酸等其他试剂的例子。最后,由于其遗传和表观遗传机制,癌症化学预防剂被重新定义为化学增敏剂或放射增敏剂。在暴露于膳食植物化学物质的癌细胞中,持续的 DNA 损伤反应加上修复不足可能是诱导细胞凋亡的关键机制。未来的研究,包括适当的临床研究,应该在癌症中失调的遗传和表观遗传机制的背景下,阐明这些新出现的概念,以及特定饮食干预策略的利弊。