Suppr超能文献

系统性硬化症并发症的治疗:一线治疗失败时的选择——系统性硬化症专家共识。

Treatment of systemic sclerosis complications: what to use when first-line treatment fails--a consensus of systemic sclerosis experts.

机构信息

Trinity College, Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Aug;42(1):42-55. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Mar 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There is a need for standardization in systemic sclerosis (SSc) management.

METHODS

SSc experts (n = 117) were sent 3 surveys to gain consensus for SSc management.

RESULTS

First-line therapy for scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) was an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi). For SRC there were not many differences between treating mild or severe SRC. In general, Second-line was to add either a calcium channel blocker (CCB) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and then an alpha-blocker (66% agreed). Endothelin receptor agonists (ERAs) were the first treatment in mild pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (72%), followed by adding a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) (77%) and then a prostanoid (73%). For severe PAH, initial treatment was 1 of the following: a prostanoid (49%), combination of a ERA and a PDE5i (18%), or combination of a ERA and a prostanoid (16%) (71% agreed). For mild Raynaud's phenomenon (RF), after a CCB and adding a PDE5i (35%), trying an ARB (32%) and finally a prostanoid (23%) was suggested. For more severe RF, 54% agreed on adding a PDE5i (45%) or prostanoid (32%) to a CCB. In the prevention of digital ulcers (DU), initial treatment was a CCB (73%), then adding a PDE5i, then use of a ERA, and then a prostanoid (44% agreed). In interstitial lung disease/pulmonary fibrosis, for induction, usually intravenous cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine were chosen. For maintenance, MMF was chosen by three-fourths (56% agreed). For gastroesophageal reflux disease, >50% would exceed the maximum recommended proton pump inhibitor dose if required (72% agreed). For skin involvement after methotrexate, MMF was usually chosen (37% agreement). For SSC-related inflammatory arthritis, methotrexate therapy (60%) was followed by adding corticosteroids (37%) or hydroxychloroquine (31%) (62% agreed).

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancies in drug choices occurred in treatment after first line in SSc. Not all algorithms had good agreement. This study provides some guidance for SSc management.

摘要

目的

系统性硬化症(SSc)的管理需要标准化。

方法

向 117 名 SSc 专家发送了 3 份调查问卷,以就 SSc 管理达成共识。

结果

硬皮病肾危象(SRC)的一线治疗是血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)。对于 SRC,治疗轻度或重度 SRC 之间并没有太多差异。一般来说,二线治疗是加用钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB),然后加用α受体阻滞剂(66%的人同意)。内皮素受体拮抗剂(ERAs)是轻度肺动脉高压(PAH)的首选治疗药物(72%),其次是加用磷酸二酯酶-5 抑制剂(PDE5i)(77%),然后是前列环素(73%)。对于严重的 PAH,初始治疗为以下之一:前列环素(49%)、ERA 和 PDE5i 联合治疗(18%)或 ERA 和前列环素联合治疗(16%)(71%的人同意)。对于轻度雷诺现象(RF),在加用 CCB 后,加用 PDE5i(35%),尝试 ARB(32%),最后是前列环素(23%)。对于更严重的 RF,54%的人同意在 CCB 上加用 PDE5i(45%)或前列环素(32%)。在预防手指溃疡(DU)方面,初始治疗是 CCB(73%),然后加用 PDE5i,然后使用 ERA,最后使用前列环素(44%的人同意)。在间质性肺疾病/肺纤维化中,诱导治疗通常选择静脉注射环磷酰胺和霉酚酸酯(MMF)或硫唑嘌呤。维持治疗时,四分之三的人选择 MMF(56%的人同意)。对于胃食管反流病,如果需要,超过 50%的人会超过最大推荐质子泵抑制剂剂量(72%的人同意)。对于甲氨蝶呤治疗后的皮肤受累,通常选择 MMF(37%的人同意)。对于 SSc 相关炎症性关节炎,甲氨蝶呤治疗(60%)后加用皮质类固醇(37%)或羟氯喹(31%)(62%的人同意)。

结论

SSc 一线治疗后药物选择存在差异。并非所有算法都具有良好的一致性。本研究为 SSc 的管理提供了一些指导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验