Crim Matthew T, Yoon Sung Sug Sarah, Ortiz Eduardo, Wall Hilary K, Schober Susan, Gillespie Cathleen, Sorlie Paul, Keenan Nora, Labarthe Darwin, Hong Yuling
Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, GA 30341, USA.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May;5(3):343-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963439. Epub 2012 May 1.
Clear and consistent definitions of hypertension and hypertension control are crucial to guide diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance. A variety of surveillance definitions are in frequent use, resulting in variation of reported hypertension prevalence and control, even when based on the same data set.
To assess the variety of published surveillance definitions and rates, we performed a literature search for studies and reports that used National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) data from at least as recent as the 2003 to 2004 survey cycle. We identified 19 studies that used various criteria for defining hypertension and hypertension control, as well as different parameters for age adjustment and inclusion of subpopulations. This resulted in variation of reported age-standardized hypertension prevalence from 28.9% to 32.1% and hypertension control from 35.1% to 64%. We then assessed the effects of varying the definitions of hypertension and hypertension control, parameters for age adjustment, and inclusion of subpopulations on NHANES data from both 2007 to 2008 (n=5645) and 2005 to 2008 (n=10 365). We propose standard surveillance definitions and age-adjustment parameters for hypertension and hypertension control. By using our recommended approach with NHANES 2007 to 2008 data, the age-standardized prevalence of hypertension in the United States was 29.8% (SE, 0.62%) and the rate of hypertension control was 45.8% (SE, 4.03%).
Surveillance definitions of hypertension and hypertension control vary in the literature. We present standard definitions of hypertension prevalence and control among adults and standard parameters for age-adjustment and population composition that will enable meaningful population comparisons and monitoring of trends.
高血压及高血压控制的清晰且一致的定义对于指导诊断、治疗和监测至关重要。多种监测定义经常被使用,这导致即使基于相同的数据集,所报告的高血压患病率和控制率也存在差异。
为评估已发表的监测定义和率的多样性,我们对使用至少自2003 - 2004调查周期以来的美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)数据的研究和报告进行了文献检索。我们确定了19项研究,这些研究使用了各种标准来定义高血压和高血压控制,以及不同的年龄调整参数和亚人群纳入标准。这导致所报告的年龄标准化高血压患病率在28.9%至32.1%之间变化,高血压控制率在35.1%至64%之间变化。然后,我们评估了改变高血压和高血压控制的定义、年龄调整参数以及亚人群纳入标准对2007 - 2008年(n = 5645)和2005 - 2008年(n = 10365)NHANES数据的影响。我们提出了高血压和高血压控制的标准监测定义以及年龄调整参数。通过对2007 - 2008年NHANES数据采用我们推荐的方法,美国年龄标准化高血压患病率为29.8%(标准误,0.62%),高血压控制率为45.8%(标准误,4.03%)。
文献中高血压和高血压控制的监测定义各不相同。我们提出了成人高血压患病率和控制的标准定义以及年龄调整和人群构成的标准参数,这将有助于进行有意义的人群比较和趋势监测。