Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, 1100 Olive Way, Suite 1400, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 15;156(10):673-83. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-10-201205150-00003.
Improving a patient's ability to self-monitor and manage changes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) symptoms may improve outcomes.
To determine the efficacy of a comprehensive care management program (CCMP) in reducing the risk for COPD hospitalization.
A randomized, controlled trial comparing CCMP with guideline-based usual care. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00395083) SETTING: 20 Veterans Affairs hospital-based outpatient clinics.
Patients hospitalized for COPD in the past year.
The CCMP included COPD education during 4 individual sessions and 1 group session, an action plan for identification and treatment of exacerbations, and scheduled proactive telephone calls for case management. Patients in both the intervention and usual care groups received a COPD informational booklet; their primary care providers received a copy of COPD guidelines and were advised to manage their patients according to these guidelines. Patients were randomly assigned, stratifying by site based on random, permuted blocks of variable size.
The primary outcome was time to first COPD hospitalization. Staff blinded to study group performed telephone-based assessment of COPD exacerbations and hospitalizations, and all hospitalizations were blindly adjudicated. Secondary outcomes included non-COPD health care use, all-cause mortality, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, disease knowledge, and self-efficacy.
Of the eligible patients, 209 were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 217 to the usual care group. Citing serious safety concerns, the data monitoring committee terminated the intervention before the trial's planned completion after 426 (44%) of the planned total of 960 patients were enrolled. Mean follow-up was 250 days. When the study was stopped, the 1-year cumulative incidence of COPD-related hospitalization was 27% in the intervention group and 24% in the usual care group (hazard ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.70 to 1.80]; P= 0.62). There were 28 deaths from all causes in the intervention group versus 10 in the usual care group (hazard ratio, 3.00 [CI, 1.46 to 6.17]; P= 0.003). Cause could be assigned in 27 (71%) deaths. Deaths due to COPD accounted for the largest difference: 10 in the intervention group versus 3 in the usual care group (hazard ratio, 3.60 [CI, 0.99 to 13.08]; P= 0.053).
Available data could not fully explain the excess mortality in the intervention group. Ability to assess the quality of the educational sessions provided by the case managers was limited.
A CCMP in patients with severe COPD had not decreased COPD-related hospitalizations when the trial was stopped prematurely. The CCMP was associated with unanticipated excess mortality, results that differ markedly from similar previous trials. A data monitoring committee should be considered in the design of clinical trials involving behavioral interventions.
提高患者自我监测和管理慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)症状变化的能力可能会改善预后。
确定综合护理管理方案(CCMP)在降低 COPD 住院风险方面的疗效。
一项比较 CCMP 与基于指南的常规护理的随机对照试验。(临床试验.gov 注册号:NCT00395083)
20 家退伍军人事务部基于门诊的诊所。
过去一年因 COPD 住院的患者。
CCMP 包括 4 次个体会议和 1 次小组会议期间的 COPD 教育、识别和治疗加重的行动计划,以及针对病例管理的计划主动电话呼叫。干预组和常规护理组的患者均收到了 COPD 信息手册;他们的初级保健提供者收到了 COPD 指南的副本,并被建议根据这些指南管理他们的患者。患者按基地随机分配,根据大小可变的随机排列块进行分层。
主要结局是首次 COPD 住院的时间。对研究组进行电话评估 COPD 加重和住院情况的工作人员进行了盲法评估,所有住院情况均进行了盲法裁决。次要结局包括非 COPD 医疗保健使用、全因死亡率、健康相关生活质量、患者满意度、疾病知识和自我效能。
在符合条件的患者中,209 名患者被随机分配至干预组,217 名患者被随机分配至常规护理组。由于严重的安全问题,数据监测委员会在计划的 960 名患者中的 426 名(44%)入组后提前终止了干预。平均随访时间为 250 天。研究停止时,干预组的 1 年 COPD 相关住院累积发生率为 27%,常规护理组为 24%(风险比,1.13[95%CI,0.70 至 1.80];P=0.62)。干预组有 28 例与全因相关的死亡,而常规护理组有 10 例(风险比,3.00[CI,1.46 至 6.17];P=0.003)。在 27 例(71%)死亡中可以确定死因。死亡原因中 COPD 占比最大:干预组 10 例,常规护理组 3 例(风险比,3.60[CI,0.99 至 13.08];P=0.053)。
现有数据无法充分解释干预组的超额死亡率。评估病例管理者提供的教育课程质量的能力有限。
在提前停止试验时,严重 COPD 患者的 CCMP 并未降低 COPD 相关住院率。CCMP 与意外的超额死亡率相关,结果与先前的类似试验明显不同。在涉及行为干预的临床试验设计中,应考虑设立数据监测委员会。