Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, South Dakota State University, Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57107, USA.
Popul Health Manag. 2012 Aug;15(4):220-9. doi: 10.1089/pop.2011.0037. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
No single gold standard of comorbidity measure has been identified, and the performance of comorbidity indices vary according to the outcome of interest. The authors compared the Charlson Comorbidity Index, Elixhauser Index (EI), Chronic Disease Score (CDS), and Health-related Quality of Life Comorbidity Index (HRQL-CI) in predicting health care-related behaviors (physicians' concordance with diabetes care standards and patients' oral antidiabetic drug [OAD] adherence) and outcomes (health care utilization and expenditures) among Medicaid enrollees with type 2 diabetes. A total of 9832 diabetes patients who used OAD were identified using data from the MarketScan Medicaid database from 2003 to 2007. Predictive performance of the comorbidity index was assessed using multiple regression models controlling for patient demographics, diabetes severity, and baseline health care characteristics. Among the 4 indices, the CDS was best at predicting physician's concordance with care standards. The CDS and HRQL-CI mental index performed better than other indices as predictors of medication adherence. The EI was best at predicting health care utilization and expenditures. These results suggest that, for these low-income diabetes patients, the CDS and HRQL-CI mental index were relatively better risk-adjustment tools for health care-related behavior data evaluation and the EI was the first choice for health care utilization and expenditures data.
尚无单一的共病测量金标准得到确认,且共病指数的表现因所关注的结局而异。作者在预测医疗保健相关行为(医生与糖尿病护理标准的一致性以及患者口服降糖药 [OAD] 的依从性)和结局(医疗保健利用和支出)方面比较了 Charlson 共病指数、Elixhauser 指数(EI)、慢性疾病评分(CDS)和健康相关生活质量共病指数(HRQL-CI)在医疗补助计划中 2 型糖尿病患者的表现。共病指数的预测性能使用多元回归模型进行评估,模型控制了患者人口统计学、糖尿病严重程度和基线医疗保健特征。在这 4 个指数中,CDS 在预测医生与护理标准的一致性方面表现最佳。CDS 和 HRQL-CI 心理指数在预测药物依从性方面优于其他指数。EI 最能预测医疗保健的利用和支出。这些结果表明,对于这些低收入的糖尿病患者,CDS 和 HRQL-CI 心理指数在评估医疗保健相关行为数据方面是相对较好的风险调整工具,而 EI 是医疗保健利用和支出数据的首选。