Suppr超能文献

连续多天冷水浸泡:对自行车运动表现和心率变异性的影响。

Consecutive days of cold water immersion: effects on cycling performance and heart rate variability.

机构信息

Centre of Excellence for Applied Sport Science Research, Queensland Academy of Sport, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013 Feb;113(2):371-84. doi: 10.1007/s00421-012-2445-2. Epub 2012 Jul 3.

Abstract

We investigated performance and heart rate (HR) variability (HRV) over consecutive days of cycling with post-exercise cold water immersion (CWI) or passive recovery (PAS). In a crossover design, 11 cyclists completed two separate 3-day training blocks (120 min cycling per day, 66 maximal sprints, 9 min time trialling [TT]), followed by 2 days of recovery-based training. The cyclists recovered from each training session by standing in cold water (10 °C) or at room temperature (27 °C) for 5 min. Mean power for sprints, total TT work and HR were assessed during each session. Resting vagal-HRV (natural logarithm of square-root of mean squared differences of successive R-R intervals; ln rMSSD) was assessed after exercise, after the recovery intervention, during sleep and upon waking. CWI allowed better maintenance of mean sprint power (between-trial difference [90 % confidence limits] +12.4 % [5.9; 18.9]), cadence (+2.0 % [0.6; 3.5]), and mean HR during exercise (+1.6 % [0.0; 3.2]) compared with PAS. ln rMSSD immediately following CWI was higher (+144 % [92; 211]) compared with PAS. There was no difference between the trials in TT performance (-0.2 % [-3.5; 3.0]) or waking ln rMSSD (-1.2 % [-5.9; 3.4]). CWI helps to maintain sprint performance during consecutive days of training, whereas its effects on vagal-HRV vary over time and depend on prior exercise intensity.

摘要

我们研究了连续几天骑自行车后进行冷水浸泡(CWI)或被动恢复(PAS)对运动表现和心率变异性(HRV)的影响。在交叉设计中,11 名自行车运动员完成了两个单独的 3 天训练块(每天 120 分钟骑行,66 次最大冲刺,9 分钟计时赛[TT]),然后进行 2 天基于恢复的训练。自行车运动员在每个训练课后站在冷水中(10°C)或室温(27°C)中恢复 5 分钟。每次训练时都评估冲刺的平均功率、总 TT 工作和 HR。运动后、恢复干预后、睡眠期间和醒来时评估静息迷走神经 HRV(均方根差异的自然对数平方根的均方根差异;ln rMSSD)。与 PAS 相比,CWI 可更好地维持平均冲刺功率(组间差异[90%置信区间] +12.4%[5.9; 18.9])、踏频(+2.0%[0.6; 3.5])和运动时的平均 HR(+1.6%[0.0; 3.2])。与 PAS 相比,CWI 后立即的 ln rMSSD 更高(+144%[92; 211])。TT 表现(-0.2%[-3.5; 3.0])或醒来时的 ln rMSSD(-1.2%[-5.9; 3.4])在试验之间没有差异。CWI 有助于在连续几天的训练中维持冲刺表现,而其对迷走神经 HRV 的影响随时间而变化,并且取决于先前的运动强度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验