Xie Wen-Ping, Wang Shao-Bing, Zhu Xin-Ping, Chen Kun-Ci, Pan De-Bo, Hong Xiao-You, Yin Yi
Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510380, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2012 Jun;33(6):1808-15.
In order to investigate the heavy metal concentrations and their potential ecological risks in surface sediments of lower reaches and estuary of Pearl River, 21 bottom sediment samples were collected from lower reaches and estuary of Pearl River. Total contents of Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Cd, Sb, Pb and Hg in these samples were measured by the inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and the atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS) and using the index of geoaccumulation and the potential ecological risk index to evaluate the pollution degree of heavy metals in the sediments. Results indicated that the concentration of total Fe and total Mn were 41658.73 and 1104.73 mg x kg(-1) respectively and toxic trace metals, such as Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Cd, Sb, Pb and Hg were 86.62, 18.18, 54.10, 80.20, 543.60, 119.55, 4.28, 10.60, 20.26, 104.58 and 0.520 mg x kg(-1). The descending order of pollution degree of various metals is: Cd > As approximately Zn > Hg > Pb approximately Cu approximately Cr, while the single potential ecological risk followed the order: Cd > Hg > As > Cu > Pb > Zn > Cr. The pollution extent and potential ecological risk of Cd were the most serious among all heavy metals. The distribution pattern of Cd individual potential ecological risk indices is exactly the same as that of general potential ecological risk indices for all heavy metals. Clustering analysis indicates that the sampling stations may be classified into five groups which basically reflected the characteristics of the heavy metal contamination and sedimentation environments along the different river reaches in lower reaches and estuary of Pearl Rive. In general, the serious heavy metal pollution and the high potential ecological risk existed in three river reaches: Chengcun-Shawan, Chengcun-Shundegang and Waihai-Hutiaomen. The pollution degree and potential ecological risk are higher in related river reaches of Beijiang than that in other lower reaches and estuary of Pearl River.
为研究珠江下游及河口表层沉积物中重金属含量及其潜在生态风险,采集了珠江下游及河口21个底泥样品。采用电感耦合等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS)和原子荧光光谱法(AFS)测定了这些样品中Cr、Mn、Fe、Co、Ni、Cu、Zn、As、Se、Cd、Sb、Pb和Hg的总量,并利用地累积指数和潜在生态风险指数对沉积物中重金属污染程度进行评价。结果表明,总Fe和总Mn含量分别为41658.73和1104.73mg·kg-1,Cr、Co、Ni、Cu、Zn、As、Se、Cd、Sb、Pb和Hg等有毒痕量金属含量分别为86.62、18.18、54.10、80.20、543.60、119.55、4.28、10.60、20.26、104.58和0.520mg·kg-1。各金属污染程度由高到低依次为:Cd>As≈Zn>Hg>Pb≈Cu≈Cr,单项潜在生态风险顺序为:Cd>Hg>As>Cu>Pb>Zn>Cr。Cd的污染程度和潜在生态风险在所有重金属中最为严重。Cd单项潜在生态风险指数分布格局与所有重金属综合潜在生态风险指数分布格局完全一致。聚类分析表明,采样站位可分为5组,基本反映了珠江下游及河口不同河段重金属污染及沉积环境特征。总体而言,程村-沙湾、程村-顺德港、外海-虎跳门3个河段存在严重的重金属污染和较高的潜在生态风险。北江相关河段的污染程度和潜在生态风险高于珠江下游及河口其他区域。