Vidal Liat, Gafter-Gvili Anat, Gurion Ronit, Raanani Pia, Dreyling Martin, Shpilberg Ofer
Department of Medicine E, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD009045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009045.pub2.
Indolent B cell lymphoid malignancies include follicular lymphoma, small lymphocytic lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and marginal zone lymphomas. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is a lymphoid malignancy similar to small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in its leukaemic phase.Indolent lymphoid malignancies including CLL are characterised by slow growth, a high initial response rate and a relapsing and progressive disease course. Advanced-stage indolent B cell lymphoid malignancies are often incurable. If symptoms or progressive disease occur, chemotherapy plus rituximab is indicated. No chemotherapy regimen has been shown to improve overall survival compared to a different regimen.Bendamustine is efficacious in the treatment of patients with indolent B cell lymphoid malignancies. A number of randomised controlled trials have examined the effect of bendamustine compared to other chemotherapy regimens in these patients. Improved disease control with no survival benefit is shown.
To evaluate the efficacy of bendamustine therapy for patients with indolent B cell lymphoid malignancies including CLL.
We electronically searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2012), EMBASE (1974 to November 2011), LILACS (1982 to May 2012), databases of ongoing trials (accessed 30 April 2012) and relevant conference proceedings. We searched references of identified trials and contacted the first author of each included trial.
Randomised controlled trials that compared a bendamustine-containing regimen to other chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy.
Two authors independently appraised the quality of each trial and extracted data from included trials. We estimated and pooled hazard ratios (HR) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
We included five trials randomising 1343 adult patients in the systematic review. Allocation and blinding were unclear in three trials and adequate in two. Incomplete outcome data and selective reporting were adequate in all trials. Trials varied in the type of lymphoid malignancy, bendamustine regimen and the comparator regimen. In the three trials that included patients with follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma and other indolent lymphomas the comparator treatment was cyclophosphamide, a combination of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and prednisone, and fludarabine. Two trials included only patients with CLL and compared bendamustine to chlorambucil, and to fludarabine. We did not conduct a meta-analysis due to the clinical heterogeneity among trials. Bendamustine had no statistically significant effect on the overall survival of patients with indolent B cell lymphoid malignancies in any of the included trials (trials of moderate quality). Progression-free survival was statistically significantly improved with bendamustine treatment compared to other chemotherapy in three of the four trials that reported on it. One trial demonstrated a non statistically significant improvement of PFS. The risk of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was similar when bendamustine was compared to CHOP and fludarabine, and higher when compared to chlorambucil. Compared to chlorambucil quality of life was unaffected by bendamustine treatment (one trial, no meta-analysis).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: As none of the currently available chemotherapeutic protocols for induction therapy in indolent B cell lymphoid malignancies confer a survival benefit and due to the improved progression-free survival in each of the included trials, and a similar rate of grade 3 or 4 adverse events, bendamustine may be considered for the treatment of patients with indolent B cell lymphoid malignancies. However, the unclear effect on survival and the higher rate of adverse events compared to chlorambucil in patients with CLL/SLL does not support the use of bendamustine for these patients.The effect of bendamustine combined with rituximab should be evaluated in randomised clinical trials with more homogenous populations and outcomes for specific subgroups of patients by type of lymphoma should be reported. Any future trial should evaluate the effect of bendamustine on quality of life.
惰性B细胞淋巴系统恶性肿瘤包括滤泡性淋巴瘤、小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤、套细胞淋巴瘤、淋巴浆细胞淋巴瘤和边缘区淋巴瘤。慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)是一种淋巴系统恶性肿瘤,在白血病期与小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤(SLL)相似。包括CLL在内的惰性淋巴系统恶性肿瘤的特点是生长缓慢、初始缓解率高以及疾病呈复发和进展过程。晚期惰性B细胞淋巴系统恶性肿瘤往往无法治愈。如果出现症状或疾病进展,则需采用化疗加利妥昔单抗治疗。与其他化疗方案相比,尚无证据表明哪种化疗方案能提高总生存率。苯达莫司汀对惰性B细胞淋巴系统恶性肿瘤患者有效。多项随机对照试验研究了苯达莫司汀与其他化疗方案在这些患者中的疗效比较。结果显示疾病控制有所改善,但无生存获益。
评估苯达莫司汀治疗包括CLL在内的惰性B细胞淋巴系统恶性肿瘤患者的疗效。
我们通过电子方式检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(《Cochrane图书馆》2012年第2期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2012年5月)、EMBASE(1974年至2011年11月)、LILACS(1982年至2012年5月)、正在进行的试验数据库(检索日期为2012年4月30日)以及相关会议论文集。我们检索了已识别试验的参考文献,并联系了每项纳入试验的第一作者。
比较含苯达莫司汀方案与其他化疗(联合或不联合免疫治疗)的随机对照试验。
两位作者独立评估每项试验的质量,并从纳入试验中提取数据。我们估计并汇总了风险比(HR)和比值比(RR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。
我们在系统评价中纳入了5项随机分配1343例成年患者的试验。3项试验的分配和盲法情况不明确,2项试验充分。所有试验中不完整的结局数据和选择性报告情况均充分。试验在淋巴系统恶性肿瘤类型、苯达莫司汀方案和对照方案方面存在差异。在纳入滤泡性淋巴瘤、套细胞淋巴瘤和其他惰性淋巴瘤患者的3项试验中,对照治疗为环磷酰胺、环磷酰胺、长春新碱、多柔比星和泼尼松的联合方案以及氟达拉滨。2项试验仅纳入了CLL患者,比较了苯达莫司汀与苯丁酸氮芥以及与氟达拉滨的疗效。由于试验之间存在临床异质性,我们未进行Meta分析。在任何纳入试验(中等质量试验)中,苯达莫司汀对惰性B细胞淋巴系统恶性肿瘤患者的总生存均无统计学显著影响。在报告了无进展生存情况的4项试验中的3项试验中,与其他化疗相比,苯达莫司汀治疗使无进展生存有统计学显著改善。1项试验显示无进展生存有非统计学显著改善。与CHOP和氟达拉滨相比,苯达莫司汀导致3级或4级不良事件的风险相似,与苯丁酸氮芥相比则更高。与苯丁酸氮芥相比,苯达莫司汀治疗对生活质量无影响(1项试验,未进行Meta分析)。
由于目前用于惰性B细胞淋巴系统恶性肿瘤诱导治疗的化疗方案均未带来生存获益,且鉴于纳入的每项试验中无进展生存均有改善,以及3级或4级不良事件发生率相似,因此对于惰性B细胞淋巴系统恶性肿瘤患者,可考虑使用苯达莫司汀治疗。然而,其对生存的影响不明确,且与CLL/SLL患者使用苯丁酸氮芥相比不良事件发生率更高,这并不支持对这些患者使用苯达莫司汀。应在更同质化人群的随机临床试验中评估苯达莫司汀联合利妥昔单抗的疗效,并应报告针对特定淋巴瘤亚型患者的结局。未来的任何试验均应评估苯达莫司汀对生活质量的影响。