Rughani Guy, Robertson Lindsay, Clarke Mike
The Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD009536. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009536.pub2.
Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in selected groups is now performed in England, the USA and Sweden. Patients with aneurysms over 55 mm in diameter are generally considered for elective surgical repair. Patients with aneurysm diameters below or equal to 55 mm (termed 'small AAAs') are managed with aneurysm surveillance as there is currently insufficient evidence to recommend surgery in these cases. As more patients are screened, there will be an increasing number of small AAAs identified. There is interest in pharmaceutical interventions (for example angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, antibiotics, beta-blockers, statins) which could be given to such patients to delay or reverse aneurysm expansion and reduce the need for elective surgical repair.
To assess the effects of medical treatment on the expansion rate of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.
The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (May 2012) and CENTRAL (2012, Issue 5). Clinical trials databases were searched for details of ongoing or unpublished studies. The reference lists of articles retrieved by electronic searches were searched for additional citations.
We selected randomised trials in which patients with small AAAs allocated to medical treatment with the intention of retarding aneurysm expansion were compared to patients allocated to a placebo treatment, alternative medical treatment, a different regimen of the same drug or imaging surveillance alone.
Two authors independently extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias in the trials. Meta-analyses were used when heterogeneity was considered low. The two primary outcomes were the mean difference (MD) in aneurysm diameter and the odds ratio (OR) calculated to compare the number of individuals referred to AAA surgery in each group over the trial period.
Seven trials involving 1558 participants were included in this review; 457 were involved in four trials of antibiotic medication, and 1101 were involved in three trials of beta-blocker medication. Five of the studies were rated at a high risk of bias.Individually, all of the included trials reported non-significant differences in AAA expansion rates between their intervention and control groups.The two major drug groups were then analysed separately. For AAA expansion it was only possible to combine two of the antibiotic trials in a meta-analysis. This demonstrated that roxithromycin had a small but significant protective effect (MD -0.86 mm; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.57 to -0.14). When referral to AAA surgery was compared (including all four antibiotic trials in the meta-analysis), non-significantly fewer patients were referred in the intervention groups (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.59 to 1.57) than the control groups. When only the trials reporting actual elective surgery were included in a subgroup analysis, the result remained statistically non-significant (OR 1.17; 95% CI 0.57 to 2.42).For the beta-blocker trials, when all were combined in a meta-analysis, there was a very small, non-significant protective effect for propranolol on AAA expansion (MD -0.08 mm; 95% CI -0.25 to 0.10), and non-significantly fewer patients were referred to AAA surgery in the propranolol group (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.05). Bronchospasm and shortness of breath were the main adverse effects from the beta-blockers. In one trial the adverse effects were reportedly so severe that the trial was stopped early after two years.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is some limited evidence that antibiotic medication may have a slight protective effect in retarding the expansion rates of small AAAs. The quality of the evidence makes it unclear whether this translates into fewer referrals to AAA surgery, owing mainly to the small sample sizes of the studies.Antibiotics were generally well tolerated with minimal adverse effects. Propranolol was poorly tolerated by patients in all of the beta-blocker trials and demonstrated only minimal and non-significant protective effects. Further research on beta-blockers for AAA needs to consider the use of drugs other than propranolol.In general, there is surprisingly little high quality evidence on medical treatment for small AAAs, especially in relation to the use of newer beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors and statins.
目前,英国、美国和瑞典已在特定人群中开展腹主动脉瘤(AAA)筛查。直径超过55毫米的动脉瘤患者通常会考虑接受择期手术修复。直径小于或等于55毫米的动脉瘤患者(称为“小AAA”)则采用动脉瘤监测管理,因为目前尚无足够证据推荐在这些病例中进行手术。随着筛查的患者增多,发现的小AAA数量也会增加。人们对药物干预(如血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂、抗生素、β受体阻滞剂、他汀类药物)感兴趣,这些药物可用于此类患者,以延缓或逆转动脉瘤扩张,减少择期手术修复的需求。
评估药物治疗对小腹主动脉瘤扩张率的影响。
Cochrane外周血管疾病组试验检索协调员检索了专业注册库(2012年5月)和CENTRAL(2012年第5期)。检索临床试验数据库以获取正在进行或未发表研究的详细信息。对电子检索所获文章的参考文献列表进行检索,以获取更多引用文献。
我们选择了随机试验,将分配接受药物治疗以延缓动脉瘤扩张的小AAA患者与分配接受安慰剂治疗、替代药物治疗、同一药物的不同方案或仅接受影像监测的患者进行比较。
两位作者独立提取数据并评估试验中的偏倚风险。当异质性被认为较低时,采用Meta分析。两个主要结局是动脉瘤直径的平均差(MD)以及为比较试验期间每组中接受AAA手术的个体数量而计算的比值比(OR)。
本综述纳入了7项试验,共1558名参与者;457名参与了4项抗生素药物试验,1101名参与了3项β受体阻滞剂药物试验。其中5项研究被评为高偏倚风险。单独来看,所有纳入试验均报告其干预组与对照组之间的AAA扩张率无显著差异。然后分别对两个主要药物组进行分析。对于AAA扩张,仅能将两项抗生素试验合并进行Meta分析。结果表明,罗红霉素具有微小但显著的保护作用(MD -0.86毫米;95%置信区间(CI)-1.57至-0.14)。在比较转介至AAA手术的情况时(Meta分析包括所有4项抗生素试验),干预组转介的患者数量比对照组少,但差异无统计学意义(OR 0.96;95% CI 0.59至1.57)。当亚组分析仅纳入报告实际择期手术的试验时,结果在统计学上仍无显著差异(OR 1.17;95% CI 0.57至2.42)。对于β受体阻滞剂试验,当将所有试验合并进行Meta分析时,普萘洛尔对AAA扩张有非常微小且无显著意义的保护作用(MD -0.08毫米;95% CI -0.25至0.10),普萘洛尔组转介至AAA手术的患者数量也无显著减少(OR 0.74;95% CI 0.52至1.05)。支气管痉挛和呼吸急促是β受体阻滞剂的主要不良反应。在一项试验中,据报道不良反应非常严重,以至于该试验在两年后提前终止。
有一些有限的证据表明,抗生素药物在延缓小AAA扩张率方面可能有轻微保护作用。由于研究样本量小,证据质量尚不清楚这是否会转化为更少的AAA手术转介。抗生素总体耐受性良好,不良反应最小。在所有β受体阻滞剂试验中,患者对普萘洛尔耐受性差,且仅显示出微小且无显著意义的保护作用。关于β受体阻滞剂用于AAA的进一步研究需要考虑使用普萘洛尔以外的药物。总体而言,令人惊讶的是,关于小AAA药物治疗的高质量证据很少,尤其是与使用新型β受体阻滞剂、ACE抑制剂和他汀类药物相关的证据。