Suppr超能文献

工作场所刺激物导致的支气管哮喘和 COPD——一种基于证据的方法。

Bronchial asthma and COPD due to irritants in the workplace - an evidence-based approach.

机构信息

Institute for Occupational and Maritime Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Seewartenstr, 10, 20459, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Occup Med Toxicol. 2012 Sep 26;7(1):19. doi: 10.1186/1745-6673-7-19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Respiratory irritants represent a major cause of occupational obstructive airway diseases. We provide an overview of the evidence related to irritative agents causing occupational asthma or occupational COPD.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE via PubMed. Reference lists of relevant reviews were also screened. The SIGN grading system was used to rate the quality of each study. The modified RCGP three-star system was used to grade the body of evidence for each irritant agent regarding its causative role in either occupational asthma or occupational COPD.

RESULTS

A total of 474 relevant papers were identified, covering 188 individual agents, professions or work-sites. The focus of most of the studies and the predominant diagnosis was occupational asthma, whereas occupational COPD arose only incidentally.The highest level assigned using the SIGN grading was 2+ (well-conducted systematic review, cohort or case-control study with a low risk of confounding or bias). According to the modified RCGP three-star grading, the strongest evidence of association with an individual agent, profession or work-site ("**") was found for 17 agents or work-sites, including benzene-1,2,4-tricarboxylicacid-1,2-anhydride, chlorine, platinum salt, isocyanates, cement dust, grain dust, animal farming, environmental tobacco smoke, welding fumes or construction work. Phthalic anhydride, glutaraldehyde, sulphur dioxide, cotton dust, cleaning agents, potrooms, farming (various), foundries were found to be moderately associated with occupational asthma or occupational COPD ("*[+]").

CONCLUSION

This study let us assume that irritant-induced occupational asthma and especially occupational COPD are considerably underreported. Defining the evidence of the many additional occupational irritants for causing airway disorders will be the subject of continued studies with implications for diagnostics and preventive measures.

摘要

背景

呼吸道刺激物是职业性阻塞性气道疾病的主要原因。本文就刺激性物质导致职业性哮喘或职业性 COPD 的相关证据进行了综述。

方法

检索了 MEDLINE 数据库(通过 PubMed 平台),并对相关综述的参考文献进行了筛选。使用 SIGN 分级系统对每项研究的质量进行了评分,改良的 RCGP 三星星级系统则用于评估每种刺激性物质在导致职业性哮喘或职业性 COPD 方面的证据等级。

结果

共检索到 474 篇相关文献,涵盖了 188 种不同的物质、职业或工作场所。大多数研究的重点和主要诊断是职业性哮喘,而职业性 COPD 只是偶发的。SIGN 分级的最高级别为 2+(精心设计的系统评价、队列或病例对照研究,混淆或偏倚的风险较低)。根据改良的 RCGP 三星星级分级,有 17 种物质、职业或工作场所与职业性哮喘或职业性 COPD 有最强的关联证据(**),包括邻苯二甲酸酐、氯、铂盐、异氰酸酯、水泥粉尘、谷物粉尘、动物养殖、环境烟草烟雾、焊接烟尘或建筑工作。邻苯二甲酸酐、戊二醛、二氧化硫、棉尘、清洁剂、铜熔炼车间、农业(各种)、铸造厂与职业性哮喘或职业性 COPD 有中度关联(*[+])。

结论

本研究表明,刺激性物质引起的职业性哮喘,尤其是职业性 COPD,报告的病例明显较少。确定许多其他职业性刺激物引起气道疾病的证据将是进一步研究的课题,这对诊断和预防措施具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f11/3508803/9f1ead2d9322/1745-6673-7-19-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验