Suppr超能文献

氨磺必利治疗精神分裂症的系统评价和双盲、随机、对照试验的荟萃分析。

Blonanserin for schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Feb;47(2):149-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.10.011. Epub 2012 Nov 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is uncertainty about the efficacy and tolerability of blonanserin in schizophrenia.

METHOD

PubMed, the Cochrane Library databases, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar were searched up to September 2012. A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized, controlled trials comparing blonanserin with other antipsychotics were conducted. The risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), numbers-needed-to-harm (NNH), and weighted mean difference (WMD) were calculated.

RESULTS

Four studies (total n = 1080) were identified (vs. risperidone studies [n = 508], vs. haloperidol studies [n = 572]). Comparing blonanserin with other pooled antipsychotics, there were no significant differences in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score (p = 0.75), PANSS positive (p = 0.41), PANSS negative (p = 0.09), and PANSS general psychopathology subscale scores (p = 0.96), and response rate (p = 0.72). However, blonanserin showed greater efficacy in PANSS negative subscale scores compared with haloperidol (WMD = -1.29, CI = -2.29 to -0.30, p = 0.01, I(2) = 0%). No significant differences were found in discontinuation rates between blonanserin and other pooled antipsychotics (due to any cause: p = 0.29, inefficacy: p = 0.32, adverse events: p = 0.56). Blonanserin had a 0.31 lower risk of hyperprolactinemia than the other pooled antipsychotics (CI = 0.20-0.49, NNH = not significant). While dizziness (RR = 0.47, CI = 0.23-0.93, NNH = not significant) and akathisia (RR = 0.54, CI = 0.32-0.90, NNH = 7) occurred significantly less often with blonanserin than with haloperidol, blonanserin had a 1.62 higher risk of akathisia than risperidone (CI = 1.18-2.22, NNH = 8) [corrected].

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that although blonanserin has a more beneficial effect on negative symptoms than haloperidol, there was a significant difference in the adverse events profile between blonanserin and other antipsychotics.

摘要

背景

关于布南色林治疗精神分裂症的疗效和耐受性还存在不确定性。

方法

检索了PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆数据库、PsycINFO 和 Google Scholar 中截至 2012 年 9 月的资料。对比较布南色林与其他抗精神病药的随机对照试验的个体患者数据进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。计算了风险比(RR)、95%置信区间(CI)、需要治疗人数(NNH)和加权均数差(WMD)。

结果

共确定了 4 项研究(总计 n = 1080)(与利培酮研究 [n = 508] 比较,与氟哌啶醇研究 [n = 572] 比较)。与其他汇总抗精神病药相比,布南色林治疗在阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)总分(p = 0.75)、PANSS 阳性症状(p = 0.41)、PANSS 阴性症状(p = 0.09)和 PANSS 一般精神病症状分量表评分(p = 0.96)以及反应率(p = 0.72)方面均无显著差异。然而,布南色林在 PANSS 阴性症状分量表评分方面的疗效优于氟哌啶醇(WMD = -1.29,CI = -2.29 至 -0.30,p = 0.01,I(2) = 0%)。布南色林与其他汇总抗精神病药之间的停药率无显著差异(因任何原因停药:p = 0.29,疗效不佳:p = 0.32,不良事件:p = 0.56)。与其他汇总抗精神病药相比,布南色林致高催乳素血症的风险低 0.31(CI = 0.20-0.49,NNH = 无显著差异)。与氟哌啶醇相比,布南色林引起头晕(RR = 0.47,CI = 0.23-0.93,NNH = 无显著差异)和静坐不能(RR = 0.54,CI = 0.32-0.90,NNH = 7)的风险显著降低,但布南色林致静坐不能的风险比利培酮高 1.62(CI = 1.18-2.22,NNH = 8)[校正]。

结论

我们的结果表明,尽管布南色林对阴性症状的疗效优于氟哌啶醇,但布南色林与其他抗精神病药的不良事件谱存在显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验