Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Preventive Medicine, Nashville, TN 37212, USA.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Apr;22(4):403-12. doi: 10.1002/pds.3411. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
The opioid analgesic propoxyphene was withdrawn from the US market in 2010, motivated by concerns regarding fatality in overdose and adverse cardiac effects, including prolongation of the QT interval. These concerns were based on case reports, summary vital statistics, and surrogate endpoint studies.
Using the linked Tennessee Medicaid database (1992-2007), we conducted a retrospective cohort study that compared risk of sudden cardiac, medication toxicity, and total out-of-hospital death for propoxyphene users with that for comparable nonusers of any prescribed opioid analgesic and users of hydrocodone, an opioid with similar indications. Cohort members had 1,873,500 propoxyphene prescriptions, 1,873,500 matched nonuser control periods, and 936,750 matched hydrocodone prescriptions.
Current propoxyphene users had no increased risk for sudden cardiac death (versus nonusers: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.00 [0.81-1.23]; versus current hydrocodone users: HR = 0.91 [0.68-1.21]) but did have increased risk for medication toxicity deaths (versus nonusers: HR = 1.85 [1.07-3.19], p = 0.027; versus current hydrocodone users: HR = 2.10 [0.87-5.10], p = 0.100). Because toxicity deaths were a small proportion of study deaths, total out-of-hospital mortality differed by less than 10% between the study groups and was not significantly elevated for propoxyphene (versus nonusers: HR = 1.09 [0.95-1.25]; versus current hydrocodone users: HR = 1.06 [0.87-1.29] ).
Our findings support the concern that propoxyphene has greater toxicity in overdose but do not provide evidence that it increases the risk of sudden cardiac death.
由于过量服用时的致死风险和包括 QT 间期延长在内的不良心脏效应等顾虑,阿片类镇痛药丙氧芬于 2010 年撤出美国市场。这些顾虑基于病例报告、总结生命统计数据和替代终点研究。
我们利用田纳西州医疗补助数据库(1992-2007 年)进行了一项回顾性队列研究,比较了丙氧芬使用者与任何处方阿片类镇痛药可比非使用者和可待因(一种具有相似适应证的阿片类药物)使用者的心脏性猝死、药物毒性和全部院外死亡风险。队列成员共接受了 1873500 次丙氧芬处方、1873500 次可比非使用者对照期和 936750 次可比可待因处方。
当前丙氧芬使用者的心脏性猝死风险没有增加(与非使用者相比:风险比 [HR] = 1.00 [0.81-1.23];与当前可待因使用者相比:HR = 0.91 [0.68-1.21]),但药物毒性死亡风险增加(与非使用者相比:HR = 1.85 [1.07-3.19],p = 0.027;与当前可待因使用者相比:HR = 2.10 [0.87-5.10],p = 0.100)。由于毒性死亡在研究死亡中占比较小,研究组之间的全部院外死亡率相差不到 10%,且丙氧芬并未显著升高(与非使用者相比:HR = 1.09 [0.95-1.25];与当前可待因使用者相比:HR = 1.06 [0.87-1.29])。
我们的研究结果支持丙氧芬在过量服用时毒性更大的观点,但并未提供证据表明其会增加心脏性猝死风险。