Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜胃大弯折叠术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术短期疗效比较。

Comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopic greater curvature plication and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University College of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou 310009, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2013 Aug;27(8):2768-74. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2805-y. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP) is an emerging restrictive bariatric procedure that successfully reduces the gastric volume by plication of the gastric greater curvature. The aim of this prospective nonrandomized study was to compare short-term outcomes and associated complications between LGCP and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

METHODS

From January 2011 to November 2011, a total of 39 patients were allocated to undergo either LGCP (n = 19) or LSG (n = 20). Data on the operative time, complications, hospital stay, overall cost of LSG and LGCP, body mass index loss (BMIL), percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), loss of appetite and improvement of comorbidities were collected during the follow-up examinations.

RESULTS

All procedures were completed laparoscopically. The mean operative time was 95.0 ± 17.4 minutes for the LGCP group and 85.5 ± 18.4 minutes for the LSG group (P = 0.107). No patient required reoperation due to an early complication. One patient in the LSG group was readmitted because of gastric stenosis. The mean hospital stay was 4.2 ± 1.9 days in the LGCP group and 3.9 ± 1.7 days in the LSG group (P = 0.595). The total cost of LSG was $7,826 ± 537 compared to LGCP ($3,358 ± 264) (P < 0.001). One year after surgery, the mean %EWL was 58.8 ± 16.7 % (n = 11) in the LGCP group and 80.0 ± 26.8 % (n = 11) in the LSG group (P = 0.038). Loss of feeling of hunger was reported in 27.3 % LGCP patients and 72.7 % LSG patients (P = 0.033) at 1 year after surgery. The comorbidities, including diabetes, sleep apnea and hypertension, were markedly improved in both groups 6 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term outcomes of our study demonstrate that compared with LSG, LGCP is inferior as a restrictive procedure for weight loss, despite its significantly smaller cost. Longer follow-up and prospective comparative trials are needed to confirm the long-term outcomes of this novel procedure and make definitive conclusions.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜胃大弯折叠术(LGCP)是一种新兴的限制性减重手术,通过胃大弯折叠成功减少胃容量。本前瞻性非随机研究的目的是比较 LGCP 和腹腔镜胃袖状切除术(LSG)的短期结果和相关并发症。

方法

从 2011 年 1 月至 2011 年 11 月,共有 39 名患者被分配行 LGCP(n=19)或 LSG(n=20)。在随访检查中收集手术时间、并发症、住院时间、LSG 和 LGCP 的总费用、体重指数减轻量(BMIL)、超重减轻百分比(%EWL)、食欲减退和合并症改善的数据。

结果

所有手术均经腹腔镜完成。LGCP 组的平均手术时间为 95.0±17.4 分钟,LSG 组为 85.5±18.4 分钟(P=0.107)。无患者因早期并发症而需要再次手术。LSG 组 1 例患者因胃狭窄再次入院。LGCP 组的平均住院时间为 4.2±1.9 天,LSG 组为 3.9±1.7 天(P=0.595)。LSG 的总费用为 7826±537 美元,而 LGCP 为 3358±264 美元(P<0.001)。手术后 1 年,LGCP 组的平均%EWL 为 58.8±16.7%(n=11),LSG 组为 80.0±26.8%(n=11)(P=0.038)。术后 1 年,LGCP 组有 27.3%的患者报告感到饥饿感消失,而 LSG 组有 72.7%的患者报告感到饥饿感消失(P=0.033)。两组患者的糖尿病、睡眠呼吸暂停和高血压等合并症在术后 6 个月均得到明显改善。

结论

本研究的短期结果表明,与 LSG 相比,LGCP 作为一种减重的限制术式,尽管费用明显较低,但减肥效果较差。需要更长时间的随访和前瞻性比较试验来证实这种新手术的长期结果,并得出明确的结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验