Department of Psychology, Universityof California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA90095, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2013 Jun;25(2):631-42. doi: 10.1037/a0032161. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (Version 11; BIS-11; Patton, Stanford, & Barratt, 1995) is a gold-standard measure that has been influential in shaping current theories of impulse control, and has played a key role in studies of impulsivity and its biological, psychological, and behavioral correlates. Psychometric research on the structure of the BIS-11, however, has been scant. We therefore applied exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to data collected using the BIS-11 in a community sample (N = 691). Our goal was to test 4 theories of the BIS-11 structure: (a) a unidimensional model, (b) a 6 correlated first-order factor model, (c) a 3 second-order factor model, and (d) a bifactor model. Among the problems identified were (a) low or near-zero correlations of some items with others; (b) highly redundant content of numerous item pairs; (c) items with salient cross-loadings in multidimensional solutions; and, ultimately, (d) poor fit to confirmatory models. We conclude that use of the BIS-11 total score as reflecting individual differences on a common dimension of impulsivity presents challenges in interpretation. Also, the theory that the BIS-11 measures 3 subdomains of impulsivity (attention, motor, and nonplanning) was not empirically supported. A 2-factor model is offered as an alternative multidimensional structural representation.
Barratt 冲动量表(第 11 版;BIS-11;Patton、Stanford 和 Barratt,1995)是一种金标准衡量标准,对当前冲动控制理论的形成产生了深远影响,并在冲动及其生物学、心理学和行为相关性的研究中发挥了关键作用。然而,BIS-11 结构的心理计量学研究相对较少。因此,我们使用 BIS-11 在社区样本(N=691)中收集的数据进行了探索性和验证性因素分析。我们的目标是测试 BIS-11 结构的 4 种理论:(a)单维模型,(b)6 个相关的一阶因子模型,(c)3 个二阶因子模型,和(d)双因子模型。确定的问题包括:(a)一些项目与其他项目的相关性低或接近零;(b)许多项目对的内容高度重复;(c)多维解决方案中项目具有明显的交叉负荷;最终,(d)验证模型拟合不佳。我们得出结论,使用 BIS-11 总分来反映冲动的共同维度上的个体差异在解释上存在挑战。此外,BIS-11 测量冲动的 3 个亚域(注意力、运动和非计划)的理论在经验上没有得到支持。作为替代的多维结构表示,提出了 2 因素模型。