Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Clin Dermatol. 2013 May-Jun;31(3):237-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2012.08.012.
Melanoma is the third most common skin cancer but the leading cause of death from cutaneous malignancies. Although early-stage disease is frequently cured by surgical resection with excellent long-term survival, patients with deeper primary lesions (AJCC stage IIB-C) and those with microscopic (IIIA) or clinically evident regional lymph node or in-transit metastases (IIIB-C) have an increased risk of relapse and death, the latter approaching 70% or more at 5 years. In patients at high risk of recurrence/metastases, adjuvant therapy with high-dose interferon alpha-2b (HDI) following definitive surgical resection has been shown to improve relapse-free and overall survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy have offered the prospect to improve regional recurrence risk and overall survival in several solid tumors. The advent of effective new molecularly targeted therapies for metastatic disease and new immunotherapies that overcome checkpoints of immune response have augmented the range of new options that are in current trial evaluation to determine their role as potential adjuvant therapies, alone and in combination with one another, and the established modality of IFN-α. The differential characteristics of the host immune response between early and advanced melanoma provide a strong mechanistic rationale for the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapeutic approaches in melanoma, and the opportunity to evaluate the mechanism of action suggest neoadjuvant trial evaluation for each of the new candidate agents and combinations of interest. Several neoadjuvant trials have been conducted in the phase II setting, which have illuminated the mechanism of IFN-α, as well as providing insight to the effects of anti-CTLA4 blocking antibodies. These agents (anti-CTLA4 blocking antibody ipilimumab, and BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib) are likely to be followed by other immunotherapies that may overcome the PD-1 checkpoint (anti-PD1 and anti-PDL-1) as well as other molecularly targeted agents such as the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib and the MEK inhibitors trametinib, selumetinib, and MEK162 in the near future. Evaluation of the clinical role of these agents as adjuvant therapy will take years to accomplish to ascertain the relapse-free survival benefits and overall survival benefits of these agents, but neoadjuvant exploration may provide early critical evidence of the therapeutic benefits, as well as clarifying the mechanisms of these agents alone and in combination.
黑色素瘤是第三大常见皮肤癌,但却是皮肤恶性肿瘤死亡的主要原因。虽然早期疾病常通过手术切除治愈,长期生存率很高,但原发灶较深(AJCC 分期 IIB-C 期)、存在镜下(IIIA 期)或临床明显区域淋巴结或远处转移(IIIB-C 期)的患者复发和死亡风险增加,后者在 5 年内接近 70%或更高。对于复发/转移风险高的患者,在确定性手术切除后使用高剂量干扰素 alpha-2b(HDI)进行辅助治疗已被证明可以改善无复发生存率和总生存率。新辅助化疗和/或放疗在几种实体瘤中提供了降低区域复发风险和总生存率的前景。转移性疾病有效新型分子靶向治疗的出现以及克服免疫反应检查点的新型免疫疗法增加了目前正在临床试验评估的新治疗方案的范围,以确定它们作为潜在辅助疗法的作用,以及单独和相互组合的作用,以及 IFN-α 的既定模式。早期和晚期黑色素瘤之间宿主免疫反应的差异特征为黑色素瘤使用新辅助免疫治疗方法提供了强有力的机制依据,并为评估每种新候选药物和组合的作用机制提供了机会。已经进行了几项新辅助试验,这些试验阐明了 IFN-α 的作用机制,并为抗 CTLA4 阻断抗体的作用提供了深入了解。这些药物(抗 CTLA4 阻断抗体伊匹单抗和 BRAF 抑制剂维莫非尼)可能会被其他免疫疗法所取代,这些免疫疗法可能会克服 PD-1 检查点(抗 PD1 和抗 PDL-1)以及其他分子靶向药物,如 BRAF 抑制剂达拉非尼和 MEK 抑制剂曲美替尼、selumetinib 和 MEK162 在不久的将来。评估这些药物作为辅助治疗的临床作用需要数年时间才能确定这些药物的无复发生存获益和总生存获益,但新辅助探索可能会提供这些药物单独和联合治疗的早期关键证据,以及阐明这些药物的作用机制。