Hôpital St-Antoine and Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Gastroenterology. 2013 Oct;145(4):758-65.e2; quiz e14-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.04.048. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Immunomodulator therapy is effective for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) but has not been shown to affect disease progression, presumably because it is given too late after diagnosis. We compared the efficacy of early treatment (within 6 months after diagnosis) with azathioprine versus conventional management of patients at high risk for disabling disease.
We performed an open-label trial of adults with a diagnosis of CD for less than 6 months who were at risk for disabling disease. From July 2005 to November 2010, patients at 24 French centers were randomly assigned to treatment with azathioprine (2.5 mg ∙ kg(-1) ∙ day(-1), n = 65) or conventional management (azathioprine only in cases of corticosteroid dependency, chronic active disease with frequent flares, poor response to corticosteroids, or development of severe perianal disease) (n = 67). The primary end point was the proportion of trimesters spent in corticosteroid-free and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-free remission during the first 3 years after inclusion.
During the 3-year follow-up period, 16 patients in the azathioprine group were switched to mercaptopurine or methotrexate therapy because of intolerance or poor efficacy. Forty-one patients in the conventional management group required immunosuppressant therapy (61%; median time to first prescription, 11 months). In the azathioprine group, a median 67% of trimesters were spent in remission (interquartile range, 11%-85%) compared with 56% in the conventional management group (interquartile range, 29%-73%) (P = .69). Among secondary outcomes, a higher cumulative proportion of patients in the azathioprine group were free of perianal surgery than in the conventional management group (96% ± 3% and 82% ± 6% at month 36, respectively; P = .036). The cumulative proportion of patients free of intestinal surgery and anti-TNF therapy did not differ between groups.
Based on results from a clinical trial, administration of azathioprine within 6 months of diagnosis of CD was no more effective than conventional management in increasing time of clinical remission. Clinicaltrials.gov, Number NCT00546546.
免疫调节剂治疗对克罗恩病(CD)患者有效,但并未显示其可影响疾病进展,大概是因为它在诊断后给予得太晚。我们比较了早期(诊断后 6 个月内)给予硫唑嘌呤与对有发生致残性疾病风险的患者进行常规治疗的效果。
我们对在 6 个月内被诊断为 CD 且有发生致残性疾病风险的成人进行了一项开放性标签试验。在 2005 年 7 月至 2010 年 11 月期间,24 家法国中心的患者被随机分配至接受硫唑嘌呤(2.5 mg·kg(-1)·d(-1))治疗组(n = 65)或常规治疗组(仅在需要皮质类固醇依赖、慢性活动期疾病频繁发作、皮质类固醇反应不佳或发生严重肛周疾病时使用硫唑嘌呤)(n = 67)。主要终点是纳入后前 3 年内无皮质类固醇和无抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)缓解的季度数比例。
在 3 年的随访期间,硫唑嘌呤组中有 16 名患者因不耐受或疗效不佳而改用巯嘌呤或甲氨蝶呤治疗。常规治疗组中有 41 名患者需要免疫抑制剂治疗(61%;中位数首次处方时间为 11 个月)。在硫唑嘌呤组中,有中位数 67%的季度处于缓解期(四分位间距,11%-85%),而常规治疗组为 56%(四分位间距,29%-73%)(P =.69)。在次要结局中,硫唑嘌呤组中无肛周手术的累积比例高于常规治疗组(第 36 个月分别为 96% ± 3%和 82% ± 6%;P =.036)。两组无肠道手术和无抗 TNF 治疗的患者比例无差异。
根据一项临床试验的结果,在 CD 诊断后 6 个月内给予硫唑嘌呤与常规治疗相比,在增加临床缓解时间方面并无优势。Clinicaltrials.gov,编号 NCT00546546。