Suppr超能文献

轻水小型模块化反应堆成本的专家评估。

Expert assessments of the cost of light water small modular reactors.

机构信息

Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 11;110(24):9686-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300195110. Epub 2013 May 28.

Abstract

Analysts and decision makers frequently want estimates of the cost of technologies that have yet to be developed or deployed. Small modular reactors (SMRs), which could become part of a portfolio of carbon-free energy sources, are one such technology. Existing estimates of likely SMR costs rely on problematic top-down approaches or bottom-up assessments that are proprietary. When done properly, expert elicitations can complement these approaches. We developed detailed technical descriptions of two SMR designs and then conduced elicitation interviews in which we obtained probabilistic judgments from 16 experts who are involved in, or have access to, engineering-economic assessments of SMR projects. Here, we report estimates of the overnight cost and construction duration for five reactor-deployment scenarios that involve a large reactor and two light water SMRs. Consistent with the uncertainty introduced by past cost overruns and construction delays, median estimates of the cost of new large plants vary by more than a factor of 2.5. Expert judgments about likely SMR costs display an even wider range. Median estimates for a 45 megawatts-electric (MWe) SMR range from $4,000 to $16,300/kWe and from $3,200 to $7,100/kWe for a 225-MWe SMR. Sources of disagreement are highlighted, exposing the thought processes of experts involved with SMR design. There was consensus that SMRs could be built and brought online about 2 y faster than large reactors. Experts identify more affordable unit cost, factory fabrication, and shorter construction schedules as factors that may make light water SMRs economically viable.

摘要

分析师和决策者经常需要估算尚未开发或部署的技术的成本。小型模块化反应堆(SMR)可能成为无碳能源组合的一部分,就是这样一种技术。现有的 SMR 成本估算依赖于有问题的自上而下的方法或专有的自下而上评估。当正确执行时,专家征求意见可以补充这些方法。我们详细描述了两种 SMR 设计,然后进行了征求意见访谈,在访谈中,我们从 16 位参与或可以获得 SMR 项目工程经济评估的专家那里获得了概率判断。在这里,我们报告了涉及大型反应堆和两个轻水 SMR 的五个反应堆部署场景的隔夜成本和施工持续时间的估算。与过去成本超支和施工延误带来的不确定性一致,新大型工厂成本的中位数估计值相差超过 2.5 倍。关于 SMR 成本的专家判断显示出更广泛的范围。45 兆瓦电(MWe)SMR 的中位数估计值在 4000 美元至 16300 美元/kWe 之间,而 225-MWe SMR 的中位数估计值在 3200 美元至 7100 美元/kWe 之间。突出显示了分歧的来源,揭示了参与 SMR 设计的专家的思维过程。专家们一致认为,SMR 可以比大型反应堆快约 2 年的时间建造并上线。专家认为,更负担得起的单位成本、工厂制造和更短的施工时间表是使轻水 SMR 在经济上可行的因素。

相似文献

1
Expert assessments of the cost of light water small modular reactors.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 11;110(24):9686-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300195110. Epub 2013 May 28.
3
Expert judgments about RD&D and the future of nuclear energy.
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Nov 6;46(21):11497-504. doi: 10.1021/es300612c. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
6
7
Energy needs versus environmental pollution: a reconciliation?
Science. 1967 Jun 16;156(3781):1448-50. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3781.1448.
8
Health Opportunity Costs: Assessing the Implications of Uncertainty Using Elicitation Methods with Experts.
Med Decis Making. 2020 May;40(4):448-459. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20916450. Epub 2020 May 22.
9
Nuclear waste from small modular reactors.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jun 7;119(23):e2111833119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111833119. Epub 2022 May 31.
10
US nuclear power: The vanishing low-carbon wedge.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 10;115(28):7184-7189. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804655115. Epub 2018 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Determining our climate policy future: expert opinions about negative emissions and solar radiation management pathways.
Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. 2022;27(8):58. doi: 10.1007/s11027-022-10030-9. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
2
Comparison of the most likely low-emission electricity production systems in Estonia.
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 30;16(12):e0261780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261780. eCollection 2021.
3
A strategy to improve expert technology forecasts.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 25;118(21). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021558118.
4
Can Distributed Nuclear Power Address Energy Resilience and Energy Poverty?
Joule. 2020 Sep 16;4(9):1839-1843. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
5
Expert assessments of the cost and expected future performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells for vehicles.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 12;116(11):4899-4904. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804221116. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
6
US nuclear power: The vanishing low-carbon wedge.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 10;115(28):7184-7189. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804655115. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
7
Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):7176-84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319946111. Epub 2014 May 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Subjective judgments by climate experts.
Environ Sci Technol. 1995 Oct 1;29(10):468A-76A. doi: 10.1021/es00010a753.
2
Expert judgments about transient climate response to alternative future trajectories of radiative forcing.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 13;107(28):12451-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908906107. Epub 2010 Jun 28.
3
Expert assessments of future photovoltaic technologies.
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Dec 15;42(24):9031-8. doi: 10.1021/es8014088.
5
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
6
Decision analysis: an overview.
Oper Res. 1982 Sep-Oct;30(5):803-38. doi: 10.1287/opre.30.5.803.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验