Departments of Hematology/Oncology, University of Vermont, College of Medicine, Given E-214 89, Beaumont Ave, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA,
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Nov;28(11):1454-62. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2507-0. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
Controversy remains regarding the frequency of screening mammography. Women with different risks for developing breast cancer because of body mass index (BMI) may benefit from tailored recommendations.
To determine the impact of mammography screening interval for women who are normal weight (BMI < 25), overweight (BMI 25-29.9), or obese (BMI ≥ 30), stratified by menopausal status.
Two cohorts selected from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Patient and mammography data were linked to pathology databases and tumor registries.
The cohort included 4,432 women aged 40-74 with breast cancer; the false-positive analysis included a cohort of 553,343 women aged 40-74 without breast cancer.
Stage, tumor size and lymph node status by BMI and screening interval (biennial vs. annual). Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy by BMI and screening interval. Analyses were stratified by menopausal status.
Premenopausal obese women undergoing biennial screening had a non-significantly increased odds of a tumor size > 20 mm relative to annual screeners (odds ratio [OR] = 2.07; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.997 to 4.30). Across all BMI categories from normal to obese, postmenopausal women with breast cancer did not present with higher stage, larger tumor size or node positive tumors if they received biennial rather than annual screening. False-positive recall and biopsy recommendations were more common among annually screened women.
The only negative outcome identified for biennial vs. annual screening was a larger tumor size (> 20 mm) among obese premenopausal women. Since annual mammography does not improve stage at diagnosis compared to biennial screening and false-positive recall/biopsy rates are higher with annual screening, women and their primary care providers should weigh the harms and benefits when deciding on annual versus biennial screening.
关于筛查性乳房 X 光检查的频率仍存在争议。由于身体质量指数(BMI)的不同,患有乳腺癌风险的女性可能需要量身定制的建议。
确定正常体重(BMI<25)、超重(BMI 25-29.9)或肥胖(BMI≥30)女性的乳房 X 光检查间隔对其的影响,分层依据为绝经状态。
从乳腺癌监测联合会中选择了两个队列。患者和乳房 X 光数据与病理数据库和肿瘤登记处相关联。
该队列包括 4432 名年龄在 40-74 岁之间患有乳腺癌的女性;假阳性分析包括一个年龄在 40-74 岁之间没有乳腺癌的 553343 名女性队列。
BMI 和筛查间隔(每两年一次与每年一次)对肿瘤分期、肿瘤大小和淋巴结状态的影响。BMI 和筛查间隔对假阳性召回或活检的累积概率。分析按绝经状态分层。
接受每两年一次筛查的肥胖绝经前女性,肿瘤大小>20mm 的几率相对每年筛查者略有增加(比值比[OR]为 2.07;95%置信区间[CI]为 0.997 至 4.30)。在从正常体重到肥胖体重的所有 BMI 类别中,接受每两年一次而非每年一次筛查的绝经后乳腺癌女性,其肿瘤分期、肿瘤大小或淋巴结阳性肿瘤均未升高。每年筛查的女性中,假阳性召回和活检建议更为常见。
每两年一次与每年一次筛查相比,唯一确定的负面结果是肥胖绝经前女性的肿瘤较大(>20mm)。由于每年的乳房 X 光检查并不能改善诊断时的分期,并且每年筛查的假阳性召回/活检率更高,因此女性及其初级保健提供者在决定每年筛查与每两年筛查时,应权衡利弊。