Suppr超能文献

不同绝经状态和 BMI 下,乳腺钼靶筛查间隔对乳腺癌诊断的影响。

Impact of mammography screening interval on breast cancer diagnosis by menopausal status and BMI.

机构信息

Departments of Hematology/Oncology, University of Vermont, College of Medicine, Given E-214 89, Beaumont Ave, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA,

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Nov;28(11):1454-62. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2507-0. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Controversy remains regarding the frequency of screening mammography. Women with different risks for developing breast cancer because of body mass index (BMI) may benefit from tailored recommendations.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of mammography screening interval for women who are normal weight (BMI < 25), overweight (BMI 25-29.9), or obese (BMI ≥ 30), stratified by menopausal status.

DESIGN

Two cohorts selected from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Patient and mammography data were linked to pathology databases and tumor registries.

PARTICIPANTS

The cohort included 4,432 women aged 40-74 with breast cancer; the false-positive analysis included a cohort of 553,343 women aged 40-74 without breast cancer.

MAIN MEASURES

Stage, tumor size and lymph node status by BMI and screening interval (biennial vs. annual). Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy by BMI and screening interval. Analyses were stratified by menopausal status.

KEY RESULTS

Premenopausal obese women undergoing biennial screening had a non-significantly increased odds of a tumor size > 20 mm relative to annual screeners (odds ratio [OR] = 2.07; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.997 to 4.30). Across all BMI categories from normal to obese, postmenopausal women with breast cancer did not present with higher stage, larger tumor size or node positive tumors if they received biennial rather than annual screening. False-positive recall and biopsy recommendations were more common among annually screened women.

CONCLUSION

The only negative outcome identified for biennial vs. annual screening was a larger tumor size (> 20 mm) among obese premenopausal women. Since annual mammography does not improve stage at diagnosis compared to biennial screening and false-positive recall/biopsy rates are higher with annual screening, women and their primary care providers should weigh the harms and benefits when deciding on annual versus biennial screening.

摘要

背景

关于筛查性乳房 X 光检查的频率仍存在争议。由于身体质量指数(BMI)的不同,患有乳腺癌风险的女性可能需要量身定制的建议。

目的

确定正常体重(BMI<25)、超重(BMI 25-29.9)或肥胖(BMI≥30)女性的乳房 X 光检查间隔对其的影响,分层依据为绝经状态。

设计

从乳腺癌监测联合会中选择了两个队列。患者和乳房 X 光数据与病理数据库和肿瘤登记处相关联。

参与者

该队列包括 4432 名年龄在 40-74 岁之间患有乳腺癌的女性;假阳性分析包括一个年龄在 40-74 岁之间没有乳腺癌的 553343 名女性队列。

主要测量指标

BMI 和筛查间隔(每两年一次与每年一次)对肿瘤分期、肿瘤大小和淋巴结状态的影响。BMI 和筛查间隔对假阳性召回或活检的累积概率。分析按绝经状态分层。

主要结果

接受每两年一次筛查的肥胖绝经前女性,肿瘤大小>20mm 的几率相对每年筛查者略有增加(比值比[OR]为 2.07;95%置信区间[CI]为 0.997 至 4.30)。在从正常体重到肥胖体重的所有 BMI 类别中,接受每两年一次而非每年一次筛查的绝经后乳腺癌女性,其肿瘤分期、肿瘤大小或淋巴结阳性肿瘤均未升高。每年筛查的女性中,假阳性召回和活检建议更为常见。

结论

每两年一次与每年一次筛查相比,唯一确定的负面结果是肥胖绝经前女性的肿瘤较大(>20mm)。由于每年的乳房 X 光检查并不能改善诊断时的分期,并且每年筛查的假阳性召回/活检率更高,因此女性及其初级保健提供者在决定每年筛查与每两年筛查时,应权衡利弊。

相似文献

1
Impact of mammography screening interval on breast cancer diagnosis by menopausal status and BMI.
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Nov;28(11):1454-62. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2507-0. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
2
3
4
Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy.
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 13;173(9):807-16. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.307.
5
Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):481-92. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00004.
9
Population Attributable Risk of Advanced-Stage Breast Cancer by Race and Ethnicity.
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Feb 1;10(2):167-175. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5242.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening mammography frequency following dense breast notification among a predominantly Hispanic/Latina screening cohort.
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Aug;35(8):1133-1142. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01871-7. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
3
Cumulative Advanced Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model Developed in a Screening Mammography Population.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 May 9;114(5):676-685. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac008.
6
Age-based versus Risk-based Mammography Screening in Women 40-49 Years Old: A Cross-sectional Study.
Radiology. 2019 Aug;292(2):321-328. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181651. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
8
Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high?
Br J Radiol. 2016 Sep;89(1065):20160045. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160045. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
9
Comparative safety of diabetes medications and risk of incident invasive breast cancer: a population-based cohort study.
Cancer Causes Control. 2016 May;27(5):709-20. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0744-3. Epub 2016 Apr 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2013.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Jan;63(1):11-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
3
Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 1;156(9):635-48. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00006.
4
Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):481-92. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00004.
5
Breast imaging and intervention in the overweight and obese patient.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):296-302. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5556.
6
Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19(1):CD001877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub4.
7
Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening.
Radiology. 2011 Jan;258(1):98-105. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100655. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
8
Ductal carcinoma in situ: terminology, classification, and natural history.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(41):134-8. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq035.
9
Biomarker expression and risk of subsequent tumors after initial ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 May 5;102(9):627-37. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq101. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
10
Modelling the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening test.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2010 Oct;19(5):429-49. doi: 10.1177/0962280209359842. Epub 2010 Mar 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验