Suppr超能文献

手术前后放化疗治疗局部晚期食管癌:SEER-Medicare 分析。

Chemoradiotherapy before and after surgery for locally advanced esophageal cancer: a SEER-Medicare analysis.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University and Cancer Center, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Nov;20(12):3999-4007. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3072-9. Epub 2013 Jun 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The optimal combination and timing of therapy for esophageal cancer remains controversial. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare registry was used to assess neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic T3+ or N1+ esophageal adenocarcinoma (ACA) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) from 1995 to 2002 who underwent surgical resection within 6 months of diagnosis were studied. Medicare data defined preoperative chemoradiotherapy (preCRT), preoperative radiotherapy (preRT), postoperative CRT (postCRT), chemotherapy and surgery (CT + S), and surgery alone.

RESULTS

Of 419 eligible patients, 126 received preCRT, 55 preRT, 40 postCRT, 29 CT + S, and 169 surgery alone. PreCRT yielded median overall survival (OS) of 37 months, greater than surgery alone (17 months, p = 0.002) and postCRT (17 months, p = 0.06). PreRT (20 months, p = 0.20), postCRT (p = 0.88), and CT + S (20 months, p = 0.42) were not associated with OS benefit versus surgery alone. For SCC, preCRT improved survival versus surgery alone (p = 0.01), with a trend for ACA (p = 0.07). ACA (22 months) had greater OS than SCC (17 months) (p = 0.03). ACA, younger age, and married status were associated with increased OS. Adjusting for these, preCRT had longer OS versus surgery alone (p = 0.02) and postCRT (p = 0.03). Chemotherapy agents and surgical approach did not affect OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In the SEER-Medicare cohort, preCRT significantly improved survival versus surgery alone and postCRT for locally advanced esophageal cancer, particularly for SCC. PreRT, postCRT, and CT + S were not associated with longer survival.

摘要

目的

食管癌的最佳治疗联合和时机仍存在争议。本研究使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险登记处评估新辅助和辅助治疗。

方法

研究纳入了 1995 年至 2002 年间诊断为非转移性 T3+或 N1+食管腺癌(ACA)或鳞状细胞癌(SCC)并在诊断后 6 个月内行手术切除的患者。医疗保险数据定义了术前放化疗(preCRT)、术前放疗(preRT)、术后放化疗(postCRT)、化疗和手术(CT+S)以及单纯手术。

结果

在 419 名符合条件的患者中,126 名接受了 preCRT,55 名接受了 preRT,40 名接受了 postCRT,29 名接受了 CT+S,169 名接受了单纯手术。与单纯手术相比,preCRT 可显著延长总生存(OS)(37 个月 vs 17 个月,p=0.002)和 postCRT(17 个月,p=0.06)。preRT(20 个月,p=0.20)、postCRT(p=0.88)和 CT+S(20 个月,p=0.42)与单纯手术相比,均不能改善 OS。对于 SCC,preCRT 可改善 OS(p=0.01),但对于 ACA 有改善趋势(p=0.07)。ACA(22 个月)的 OS 优于 SCC(17 个月)(p=0.03)。ACA、年龄较轻和已婚状态与 OS 延长相关。在调整这些因素后,与单纯手术相比,preCRT 可显著延长 OS(p=0.02)和 postCRT(p=0.03)。化疗药物和手术方法并不影响 OS。

结论

在 SEER-医疗保险队列中,与单纯手术相比,preCRT 显著改善了局部晚期食管癌的生存,尤其是 SCC。preRT、postCRT 和 CT+S 与更长的生存时间无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验