Castañeda Sheila F, Xiong Yer, Gallo Linda C, Yepes-Rios Monica, Ji Ming, Talavera Ana C, Mendoza Paulina M, Talavera Gregory A
San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2012 Jul 1;3(3):164-9. doi: 10.1177/2150131911427731. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer death for Latino men and women; and Latinos are more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage, which is most likely due to underutilization of CRC preventive screening. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a brief, clinic-based intervention by a community health advisor (CHA) would increase CRC knowledge compared with traditional educational methodologies (eg, use of print materials).
Latino adults 50 years and older attending a San Diego community health center were recruited while waiting for their primary care provider routine visit and were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 CRC educational interventions: community health advisor (CHA) plus CRC educational brochure (CHA intervention group), CRC educational brochure (minimal intervention group), or 5-a-day nutrition brochure (usual care). CRC knowledge was assessed before and after the primary care provider visit for 130 participants.
Results demonstrate that the CRC educational brochure (minimal intervention group) was effective at increasing CRC screening knowledge as compared to usual care.
Future research is needed to explore innovative health education strategies that improve knowledge and subsequent CRC screening behaviors among low-income, low-literacy, unacculturated Latinos.
结直肠癌(CRC)是拉丁裔男性和女性癌症死亡的第三大主要原因;拉丁裔更有可能在较晚阶段被诊断出来,这很可能是由于结直肠癌预防性筛查的利用不足。本研究的目的是确定社区健康顾问(CHA)在诊所进行的简短干预与传统教育方法(如使用印刷材料)相比,是否会增加结直肠癌知识。
招募在圣地亚哥社区健康中心等待初级保健提供者常规就诊的50岁及以上拉丁裔成年人,并随机分配接受三种结直肠癌教育干预措施中的一种:社区健康顾问(CHA)加结直肠癌教育手册(CHA干预组)、结直肠癌教育手册(最小干预组)或每日五份营养手册(常规护理)。对130名参与者在初级保健提供者就诊前后进行结直肠癌知识评估。
结果表明,与常规护理相比,结直肠癌教育手册(最小干预组)在增加结直肠癌筛查知识方面是有效的。
需要进一步研究探索创新的健康教育策略,以提高低收入、低文化水平、未融入文化的拉丁裔人群的知识水平及随后的结直肠癌筛查行为。