Department of Integrative Zoology, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Sylvius Laboratory, Sylviusweg 72, 2333BE Leiden, the Netherlands.
Nature. 2013 Aug 22;500(7463):445-8. doi: 10.1038/nature12336. Epub 2013 Jul 7.
Evolution involves interplay between natural selection and developmental constraints. This is seen, for example, when digits are lost from the limbs during evolution. Extant archosaurs (crocodiles and birds) show several instances of digit loss under different selective regimes, and show limbs with one, two, three, four or the ancestral number of five digits. The 'lost' digits sometimes persist for millions of years as developmental vestiges. Here we examine digit loss in the Nile crocodile and five birds, using markers of three successive stages of digit development. In two independent lineages under different selection, wing digit I and all its markers disappear. In contrast, hindlimb digit V persists in all species sampled, both as cartilage, and as Sox9- expressing precartilage domains, 250 million years after the adult digit disappeared. There is therefore a mismatch between evolution of the embryonic and adult phenotypes. All limbs, regardless of digit number, showed similar expression of sonic hedgehog (Shh). Even in the one-fingered emu wing, expression of posterior genes Hoxd11 and Hoxd12 was conserved, whereas expression of anterior genes Gli3 and Alx4 was not. We suggest that the persistence of digit V in the embryo may reflect constraints, particularly the conserved posterior gene networks associated with the zone of polarizing activity (ZPA). The more rapid and complete disappearance of digit I may reflect its ZPA-independent specification, and hence, weaker developmental constraints. Interacting with these constraints are selection pressures for limb functions such as flying and perching. This model may help to explain the diverse patterns of digit loss in tetrapods. Our study may also help to understand how selection on adults leads to changes in development.
进化涉及自然选择和发育限制之间的相互作用。例如,当肢体在进化过程中失去某些数字时,就可以看到这种情况。现存的恐龙(鳄鱼和鸟类)在不同的选择机制下显示了多个数字丢失的实例,并且具有一个、两个、三个、四个或祖先的五个数字的肢体。“丢失”的数字有时会作为发育遗迹持续数百万年。在这里,我们使用三个连续的数字发育阶段的标记物来检查尼罗河鳄鱼和五种鸟类的数字丢失。在两个不同选择的独立谱系中,翅膀数字 I 和所有的标记都消失了。相比之下,在后肢中,所有采样的物种都保留了数字 V,既有软骨,也有 Sox9 表达的前软骨区域,这是成年数字消失 2.5 亿年后的情况。因此,胚胎和成年表型的进化之间存在不匹配。无论数字数量如何,所有肢体都显示出类似的 sonic hedgehog(Shh)表达。即使在只有一根手指的鸸鹋翅膀中,Hoxd11 和 Hoxd12 的后基因表达也保持不变,而Gli3 和 Alx4 的前基因表达则没有。我们认为,胚胎中数字 V 的持续存在可能反映了限制因素,特别是与极化活动区(ZPA)相关的保守后基因网络。数字 I 的更快和更完全的消失可能反映了它的 ZPA 独立指定,因此,发育限制较弱。与这些限制因素相互作用的是用于飞行和栖息等肢体功能的选择压力。这个模型可以帮助解释四足动物中不同的数字丢失模式。我们的研究也可能有助于理解对成年人的选择如何导致发育的变化。