Suppr超能文献

跨时区飞行的美国-亚洲航线飞行员的时差适应。

Circadian adaptation of airline pilots during extended duration operations between the USA and Asia.

机构信息

Sleep/Wake Research Centre, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

Chronobiol Int. 2013 Oct;30(8):963-72. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2013.790042. Epub 2013 Jul 8.

Abstract

This study tracked circadian adaptation among airline pilots before, during, and after trips where they flew from Seattle (SEA) or Los Angeles (LAX) to Asia (7--9 time zones westward), spent 7--12 d in Asia, and then flew back to the USA. In Asia, pilots' exposures to local time cues and sleep opportunities were constrained by duty (short-haul flights crossing ≤ 1 time zone/24 h). Fourteen captains and 16 first officers participated (median age = 56 versus 48 yrs, p.U) < 0.001). Their sleep was monitored (actigraphy, duty/sleep diaries) from 3 d pre-trip to 5 d post-trip. For every flight, Karolinska Sleepiness and Samn-Perelli Fatigue scales and 5-min psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) tests were completed pre-flight and at top of descent (TOD). Participants had ≥ 3 d free of duty prior to outbound flight(s). From 72--24 h prior to departure (baseline sleep), mean total sleep/24 h (TST) = 7.00 h (SD = 1.18 h) and mean sleep efficiency = 87% (SD = 4.9%). Most pilots (23/30) flew direct to and from Asia, but 7 LAX-based pilots flew via a 1-d layover in Honolulu (HNL). On flights with ≥ 2 pilots, mean total in-flight sleep varied from 0.40 to 2.09 h outbound and from 0.74 to 1.88 h inbound. Duty patterns in Asia were variable, with ≤ 2 flights/d (mean flight duration = 3.53 h, SD = 0.53 h). TST on days 17 in Asia did not differ from baseline (p.F) = 0.2031). However, mean sleep efficiency was significantly lower than baseline on days 5--7 (p.F) = 0.0041). More pilots were on duty between 20:00 and 24:00 h on days 57 (mean = 21%) than on days 24 (mean = 14%). Sleep propensity distribution phase markers and chi-square periodogram analyses suggest that adaptation to local time was complete by day 4 in Asia. On pre-flight PVT tests in Asia, the slowest 10% of responses improved for flights departing 14:00--19:59 h (p.F) = 0.0484). At TOD, the slowest 10% of responses improved across days for flights arriving 14:00--19:59 h (p.F) = 0.0349) and 20:00--01:59 h (p.F) = 0.0379). Sleepiness and fatigue ratings pre-flight and at TOD did not change across days in Asia. TST on post-trip day 1 was longer than baseline (estimated mean extension = 1.68 h; adjusted p(t) < 0.0001). On all post-trip days, sleep efficiency was comparable to baseline. Sleep propensity distribution phase markers and chi-square periodogram analyses suggest complete readaptation in 12 d. Two opposing influences appeared to affect sleep and PVT performance across days in Asia: progressive circadian adaptation to local time and increasing duty during local night, which displaced sleep from the optimal physiological time. Cumulative sleep restriction across the return flight may explain the large rebound in TST on day 1 post-trip. Thereafter TST, sleep efficiency, and sleep timing suggest that readaptation was complete. Rapid post-trip readaptation may be facilitated by pilots having unconstrained nocturnal sleep opportunities, coupled with stronger patterns of family and social cues than in Asia.

摘要

本研究跟踪了在往返西雅图(SEA)或洛杉矶(LAX)至亚洲(向西 7-9 个时区)的飞行任务前、期间和之后,飞行员的昼夜节律适应情况。他们在亚洲停留 7-12 天,然后返回美国。在亚洲,飞行员的暴露于当地时间线索和睡眠机会受到职责限制(短程航班跨越 ≤ 1 个时区/24 小时)。14 名机长和 16 名副机长参与了研究(中位年龄= 56 岁对 48 岁,p.U < 0.001)。从旅行前 3 天到旅行后 5 天,他们的睡眠通过活动记录仪、职责/睡眠日记进行监测。对于每一次飞行,在飞行前和在下降顶端(TOD)完成 Karolinska 嗜睡量表和 Samn-Perelli 疲劳量表以及 5 分钟的精神运动警觉性任务(PVT)测试。参与者在出发前有 ≥ 3 天的免职责时间。从出发前 72-24 小时(基线睡眠)开始,平均总睡眠时间/24 小时(TST)为 7.00 小时(SD=1.18 小时),平均睡眠效率为 87%(SD=4.9%)。大多数飞行员(23/30)直飞亚洲,但 7 名从洛杉矶出发的飞行员在檀香山(HNL)停留了 1 天。在有 ≥ 2 名飞行员的航班上,平均飞行中睡眠时间从出发时的 0.40 到 2.09 小时不等,返航时的 0.74 到 1.88 小时不等。亚洲的职责模式各不相同,每天最多有 2 次飞行(平均飞行时间= 3.53 小时,SD=0.53 小时)。在亚洲的第 17 天,TST 与基线没有差异(p.F=0.2031)。然而,与基线相比,第 5-7 天的平均睡眠效率明显较低(p.F=0.0041)。在第 5-7 天的 20:00 至 24:00 小时之间,更多的飞行员在值班(平均 21%),而在第 24 天,值班的飞行员比例为 14%。睡眠倾向分布阶段标记和卡方周期图分析表明,在亚洲,到第 4 天就完成了对当地时间的适应。在亚洲的飞行前 PVT 测试中,从 14:00-19:59 小时出发的航班中,最慢的 10%反应有所改善(p.F=0.0484)。在 TOD,从 14:00-19:59 小时和 20:00-01:59 小时到达的航班,最慢的 10%反应在全天都有所改善(p.F=0.0349 和 p.F=0.0379)。在亚洲,飞行前和 TOD 的睡眠和疲劳评分在整个白天没有变化。旅行后第 1 天的 TST 比基线长(估计平均延长 1.68 小时;调整后 p(t) < 0.0001)。在所有的旅行后日子里,睡眠效率与基线相当。睡眠倾向分布阶段标记和卡方周期图分析表明,在 12 天内完全重新适应。在亚洲,似乎有两种相反的影响因素会影响睡眠和 PVT 表现:随着时间的推移,对当地时间的昼夜节律逐渐适应,以及当地夜间的职责增加,从而将睡眠从最佳生理时间中转移。返回航班上的累积睡眠限制可能解释了旅行后第 1 天 TST 的大幅反弹。此后,TST、睡眠效率和睡眠时间表明完全适应。快速的旅行后适应可能是由于飞行员有不受限制的夜间睡眠机会,以及与亚洲相比,更强的家庭和社会线索模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验