Water Resources Unit, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 3;8(7):e67737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067737. Print 2013.
Research on ecosystem services has grown exponentially during the last decade. Most of the studies have focused on assessing and mapping terrestrial ecosystem services highlighting a knowledge gap on marine and coastal ecosystem services (MCES) and an urgent need to assess them.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We reviewed and summarized existing scientific literature related to MCES with the aim of extracting and classifying indicators used to assess and map them. We found 145 papers that specifically assessed marine and coastal ecosystem services from which we extracted 476 indicators. Food provision, in particular fisheries, was the most extensively analyzed MCES while water purification and coastal protection were the most frequently studied regulating and maintenance services. Also recreation and tourism under the cultural services was relatively well assessed. We highlight knowledge gaps regarding the availability of indicators that measure the capacity, flow or benefit derived from each ecosystem service. The majority of the case studies was found in mangroves and coastal wetlands and was mainly concentrated in Europe and North America. Our systematic review highlighted the need of an improved ecosystem service classification for marine and coastal systems, which is herein proposed with definitions and links to previous classifications.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This review summarizes the state of available information related to ecosystem services associated with marine and coastal ecosystems. The cataloging of MCES indicators and the integrated classification of MCES provided in this paper establish a background that can facilitate the planning and integration of future assessments. The final goal is to establish a consistent structure and populate it with information able to support the implementation of biodiversity conservation policies.
在过去的十年中,生态系统服务研究呈指数级增长。大多数研究都集中在评估和绘制陆地生态系统服务图上,突显了海洋和沿海生态系统服务(MCES)的知识差距,以及迫切需要对其进行评估。
方法/主要发现:我们回顾和总结了与 MCES 相关的现有科学文献,旨在提取和分类用于评估和绘制它们的指标。我们发现了 145 篇专门评估海洋和沿海生态系统服务的论文,从中我们提取了 476 个指标。提供食物,特别是渔业,是分析最广泛的 MCES,而水净化和海岸保护是研究最多的调节和维护服务。同样,文化服务下的娱乐和旅游也得到了相对较好的评估。我们强调了有关衡量每个生态系统服务的能力、流量或收益的指标的可用性方面的知识差距。案例研究的大部分都在红树林和沿海湿地中进行,主要集中在欧洲和北美。我们的系统评价强调了需要改进海洋和沿海系统的生态系统服务分类,本文在此提出了该分类的定义和与以前分类的链接。
结论/意义:本文总结了与海洋和沿海生态系统相关的生态系统服务的现有信息状态。本文中对 MCES 指标的编目和 MCES 的综合分类为未来评估的规划和整合提供了背景,最终目标是建立一个一致的结构,并填充能够支持实施生物多样性保护政策的信息。