Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Oct;131(1):21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.07.100. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
Gynecologic Oncology Group Study 0218 (GOG-0218), a phase III, placebo-controlled trial in newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer (OC), demonstrated a benefit in investigator (INV)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) with bevacizumab (BEV) administered with and following carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) for up to 15 months vs. CP alone. To determine the reliability of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) in assessing disease progression (PD) in GOG-0218, an independent review of radiologic and clinical data (IRC) was conducted.
Blinded reviews followed RECIST 1.0 in accordance with the study protocol; PFS was analyzed in the intent-to-treat population.
CP+BEV→BEV achieved a significant PFS improvement in both assessments. Hazard ratios for PFS (IRC: 0.623; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.503-0.772; p<0.0001 vs. INV: 0.624; 95% CI: 0.520-0.749; p<0.0001) and the improvement in median PFS (IRC: 19.1 and 13.1 months vs. INV: 18.2 and 12 months) were similar between IRC and INV assessments. There was high concordance between IRC- and INV-determined PD status (77%) and date (73%). Subgroup analyses were consistent with the primary IRC findings. Early and late discontinuation discordance measures showed no evidence of INV bias.
IRC analysis confirmed a significant PFS improvement with CP+BEV→BEV vs. CP alone. Concordance was not influenced by extent of residual disease after cytoreductive surgery or initial stage. The IRC size, high participation rate, and strong concordance between IRC and INV assessments suggest that RECIST can be applied objectively in OC studies.
妇科肿瘤学组研究 0218 号试验(GOG-0218)是一项在新诊断的 III/IV 期卵巢癌(OC)患者中进行的 III 期、安慰剂对照试验,结果表明贝伐珠单抗(BEV)联合卡铂/紫杉醇(CP)治疗 15 个月与 CP 单药治疗相比,在研究者评估的无进展生存期(PFS)方面具有显著获益。为了确定实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)在 GOG-0218 中评估疾病进展(PD)的可靠性,对放射学和临床数据(IRC)进行了独立审查。
根据研究方案,采用盲法对 RECIST1.0 进行评估;采用意向治疗人群进行 PFS 分析。
CP+BEV→BEV 在两种评估方法中均显著改善了 PFS。IRC 评估的 PFS 风险比(HR)(0.623;95%置信区间[CI]:0.503-0.772;p<0.0001)和 IRC 评估的中位 PFS 改善(19.1 和 13.1 个月)均优于 INV 评估(0.624;95% CI:0.520-0.749;p<0.0001)。IRC 和 INV 评估之间 PD 状态(77%)和日期(73%)具有高度一致性。亚组分析与主要 IRC 结果一致。早期和晚期停药不一致性测量未显示出 INV 偏倚的证据。
IRC 分析证实 CP+BEV→BEV 与 CP 单药治疗相比,PFS 显著改善。IRC 分析不受细胞减灭术后残余疾病的程度或初始分期的影响。IRC 的规模较大、参与率较高,以及 IRC 和 INV 评估之间的高度一致性表明,RECIST 可在 OC 研究中客观应用。