Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas, 7232 Greenville Ave, Dallas, TX 75231.
Hypertension. 2013 Nov;62(5):973-9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01867. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
The validity of using transcranial Doppler measurement of cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) to assess cerebral autoregulation (CA) still is a concern. This study measured CBFV in the middle cerebral artery using transcranial Doppler and volumetric cerebral blood flow (CBF) in the internal carotid artery (ICA) using color-coded duplex ultrasonography to assess CA during steady-state changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP). Twenty-one healthy adults participated. MAP was changed stepwise by intravenous infusion of sodium nitroprusside and phenylephrine. Changes in CBFV, CBF, cerebrovascular resistance (CVR=MAP/CBF), or cerebrovascular resistance index (CVRi=MAP/CBFV) were measured to assess CA by linear regression analysis. The relationship between changes in ICA diameter and MAP was assessed. All values were normalized as percentage changes from baseline. Drug-induced changes in MAP were from -26% to 31%. Changes in CBFV and CVRi in response to MAP were linear, and the regression slopes were similar between middle cerebral artery and ICA. However, CBF in ICA remained unchanged despite large changes in MAP. Consistently, a steeper slope of changes in CVR relative to CVRi was observed (0.991 versus 0.804; P<0.05). The ICA diameter changed inversely in response to MAP (r=-0.418; P<0.05). These findings indicate that CA can be assessed with transcranial Doppler measurements of CBFV and CVRi in middle cerebral artery. However, it is likely to be underestimated when compared with the measurements of CBF and CVR in ICA. The inverse relationship between changes in ICA diameter and MAP suggests that large cerebral arteries are involved in CA.
使用经颅多普勒测量脑血流速度(CBFV)来评估脑自动调节(CA)的有效性仍然存在争议。本研究使用经颅多普勒测量大脑中动脉的 CBFV,使用彩色双功能超声测量颈内动脉(ICA)的容积脑血流量(CBF),以评估在平均动脉压(MAP)稳态变化期间的 CA。21 名健康成年人参与了研究。通过静脉输注硝普钠和苯肾上腺素来逐步改变 MAP。测量 CBFV、CBF、脑血管阻力(CVR=MAP/CBF)或脑血管阻力指数(CVRi=MAP/CBFV)的变化,通过线性回归分析来评估 CA。评估 ICA 直径与 MAP 之间的关系。所有值均归一化为从基线的百分比变化。药物诱导的 MAP 变化范围为-26%至 31%。CBFV 和 CVRi 对 MAP 的变化呈线性,大脑中动脉和 ICA 之间的回归斜率相似。然而,尽管 MAP 发生了很大变化,ICA 中的 CBF 仍保持不变。一致地,观察到 CVR 相对于 CVRi 的变化斜率更陡(0.991 对 0.804;P<0.05)。ICA 直径随 MAP 呈反向变化(r=-0.418;P<0.05)。这些发现表明,CA 可以通过经颅多普勒测量大脑中动脉的 CBFV 和 CVRi 来评估。然而,与 ICA 中的 CBF 和 CVR 测量值相比,CA 可能被低估。ICA 直径与 MAP 之间的反向关系表明,大脑中的大动脉参与了 CA。