Hill Sarah, Amos Amanda, Clifford David, Platt Stephen
Global Public Health Unit, School of Social & Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Tob Control. 2014 Nov;23(e2):e89-97. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051110. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
We updated and expanded a previous systematic literature review examining the impact of tobacco control interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking.
We searched the academic literature for reviews and primary research articles published between January 2006 and November 2010 that examined the socioeconomic impact of six tobacco control interventions in adults: that is, price increases, smoke-free policies, advertising bans, mass media campaigns, warning labels, smoking cessation support and community-based programmes combining several interventions. We included English-language articles from countries at an advanced stage of the tobacco epidemic that examined the differential impact of tobacco control interventions by socioeconomic status or the effectiveness of interventions among disadvantaged socioeconomic groups. All articles were appraised by two authors and details recorded using a standardised approach. Data from 77 primary studies and seven reviews were synthesised via narrative review.
We found strong evidence that increases in tobacco price have a pro-equity effect on socioeconomic disparities in smoking. Evidence on the equity impact of other interventions is inconclusive, with the exception of non-targeted smoking cessation programmes which have a negative equity impact due to higher quit rates among more advantaged smokers.
Increased tobacco price via tax is the intervention with the greatest potential to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in smoking. Other measures studied appear unlikely to reduce inequalities in smoking without specific efforts to reach disadvantaged smokers. There is a need for more research evaluating the equity impact of tobacco control measures, and development of more effective approaches for reducing tobacco use in disadvantaged groups and communities.
我们更新并扩展了之前的一项系统性文献综述,该综述探讨了烟草控制干预措施对吸烟方面社会经济不平等的影响。
我们在学术文献中搜索了2006年1月至2010年11月期间发表的综述和原始研究文章,这些文章研究了六种针对成年人的烟草控制干预措施的社会经济影响,即:提高烟草价格、无烟政策、广告禁令、大众媒体宣传活动、警示标签、戒烟支持以及结合多种干预措施的社区项目。我们纳入了来自烟草流行处于高级阶段国家的英文文章,这些文章研究了烟草控制干预措施按社会经济地位产生的差异影响,或在社会经济弱势群体中干预措施的有效性。所有文章由两位作者进行评估,并使用标准化方法记录详细信息。通过叙述性综述对来自77项原始研究和7篇综述的数据进行了综合分析。
我们发现有力证据表明,提高烟草价格对吸烟方面的社会经济差距具有促进公平的作用。关于其他干预措施公平影响的证据尚无定论,但非针对性的戒烟项目除外,由于较富裕吸烟者的戒烟率较高,该项目具有负面的公平影响。
通过税收提高烟草价格是最有潜力减少吸烟方面社会经济不平等的干预措施。所研究的其他措施似乎不太可能减少吸烟方面的不平等,除非做出特别努力以惠及弱势吸烟者。需要开展更多研究来评估烟草控制措施的公平影响,并开发更有效的方法来减少弱势群体和社区的烟草使用。