Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL;
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 May;16 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S151-8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt143. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
Ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) are useful for understanding both between- and within-subject dynamic changes in smoking and mood. Modeling 2 moods (positive affect [PA] and negative affect [NA], PA and NA) simultaneously will better enable researchers to explore the association between mood variables and what influences them at both the momentary and subject level.
The EMA component of a natural history study of adolescent smoking was analyzed with a bivariate location-scale mixed-effects model. The proposed model separately estimates the between- and within-subject variances and jointly models the 2 mood constructs. A total of 461 adolescents completed the baseline EMA wave, which resulted in 14,105 random prompts. Smoking level, represented by the number of smoking events on EMA, entered the model as 2 predictors: one that compared nonsmokers during the EMA week to 1-cigarette smokers, and the second one that estimated the effect of smoking level on mood among smokers.
Results suggest that nonsmokers had more consistent positive and negative moods compared to 1-cigarette smokers. Among those who smoked, both moods were more consistent at higher smoking levels. The effects of smoking level were greater for NA than for PA. The within-subject association between mood constructs was negative and strongest among 1-cigarette smokers; the within-subject association between positive and negative moods was negatively associated with smoking.
Mood variation and association between mood constructs varied across smoking levels. The most infrequent smokers were characterized with more inconsistent moods, whereas mood was more consistent for subjects with higher smoking levels.
生态瞬时评估(EMA)对于理解吸烟和情绪的个体间和个体内动态变化非常有用。同时对 2 种情绪(积极情绪[PA]和消极情绪[NA],PA 和 NA)进行建模将使研究人员能够更好地探索情绪变量之间的关联以及它们在瞬间和个体水平上的影响因素。
青少年吸烟自然史研究的 EMA 部分采用双变量位置尺度混合效应模型进行分析。所提出的模型分别估计个体间和个体内方差,并联合建模 2 种情绪结构。共有 461 名青少年完成了基线 EMA 波,共产生 14,105 个随机提示。吸烟水平(用 EMA 上的吸烟事件数量表示)作为 2 个预测因子进入模型:一个是将 EMA 周内的非吸烟者与 1 支烟吸烟者进行比较,另一个是估计吸烟水平对吸烟者情绪的影响。
结果表明,与 1 支烟吸烟者相比,不吸烟者的积极和消极情绪更稳定。在吸烟者中,两种情绪在吸烟水平较高时更为稳定。吸烟水平对 NA 的影响大于 PA。情绪结构之间的个体内关联呈负相关,在 1 支烟吸烟者中最强;积极情绪和消极情绪之间的个体内关联与吸烟呈负相关。
情绪变化和情绪结构之间的关联因吸烟水平而异。吸烟频率最低的人情绪变化较大,而吸烟水平较高的人情绪更稳定。