Suppr超能文献

双相 II 型抑郁症与共病边缘型人格障碍的重度抑郁症的鉴别:人口学、临床和家族史差异。

Distinguishing bipolar II depression from major depressive disorder with comorbid borderline personality disorder: demographic, clinical, and family history differences.

机构信息

146 West River St, Providence, RI 02904

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;74(9):880-6. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08428.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Because of the potential treatment implications, it is clinically important to distinguish between bipolar II depression and major depressive disorder with comorbid borderline personality disorder. The high frequency of diagnostic co-occurrence and resemblance of phenomenological features has led some authors to suggest that borderline personality disorder is part of the bipolar spectrum. Few studies have directly compared patients with bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder. In the present study from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services project, we compared these 2 groups of patients on demographic, clinical, and family history variables.

METHOD

From December 1995 to May 2012, 3,600 psychiatric patients presenting to the outpatient practice at Rhode Island Hospital (Providence, Rhode Island) were evaluated with semistructured diagnostic interviews for DSM-IV Axis I and Axis II disorders. The focus of the present study is the 206 patients with DSM-IV major depressive disorder and borderline personality disorder (MDD-BPD) and 62 patients with DSM-IV bipolar II depression without borderline personality disorder.

RESULTS

The patients with MDD-BPD were significantly more often diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder (P < .001), a current substance use disorder (P < .01), somatoform disorder (P < .05), and other nonborderline personality disorder (P < .05). Clinical ratings of anger, anxiety, paranoid ideation, and somatization were significantly higher in the MDD-BPD group (all P < .01). The MDD-BPD patients were rated significantly lower on the Global Assessment of Functioning (P < .001), their current social functioning was poorer (P < .01), and they made significantly more suicide attempts (P < .01). The patients with bipolar II depression had a significantly higher morbid risk for bipolar disorder in their first-degree relatives than the MDD-BPD patients (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients diagnosed with bipolar II depression and major depressive disorder with comorbid borderline personality disorder differed on a number of clinical and family history variables, thereby supporting the validity of this distinction.

摘要

目的

由于潜在的治疗意义,区分双相情感障碍 II 型抑郁和伴有共病边缘型人格障碍的重性抑郁障碍在临床上非常重要。由于诊断共病的高频率和现象学特征的相似性,一些作者认为边缘型人格障碍是双相谱系的一部分。很少有研究直接比较双相障碍和边缘型人格障碍患者。在本研究中,我们来自罗德岛改善诊断评估和服务项目,比较了这两组患者的人口统计学、临床和家族史变量。

方法

从 1995 年 12 月至 2012 年 5 月,3600 名精神科患者在罗德岛医院(普罗维登斯,罗德岛)的门诊就诊,通过半结构化的 DSM-IV 轴 I 和轴 II 障碍诊断访谈进行评估。本研究的重点是 206 名符合 DSM-IV 重性抑郁障碍和边缘型人格障碍(MDD-BPD)的患者和 62 名符合 DSM-IV 双相情感障碍 II 型抑郁且无边缘型人格障碍的患者。

结果

MDD-BPD 患者明显更常被诊断为创伤后应激障碍(P <.001)、当前物质使用障碍(P <.01)、躯体形式障碍(P <.05)和其他非边缘型人格障碍(P <.05)。MDD-BPD 组的愤怒、焦虑、偏执观念和躯体化的临床评分明显更高(均 P <.01)。MDD-BPD 患者的总体功能评估(GAF)评分明显较低(P <.001),当前社会功能较差(P <.01),自杀尝试次数明显更多(P <.01)。双相情感障碍 II 型抑郁患者一级亲属患双相障碍的发病风险明显高于 MDD-BPD 患者(P <.05)。

结论

诊断为双相情感障碍 II 型抑郁和伴有共病边缘型人格障碍的重性抑郁障碍患者在许多临床和家族史变量上存在差异,从而支持这一区别的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验