Koopman Richelle J, Wakefield Bonnie J, Johanning Jennifer L, Keplinger Lynn E, Kruse Robin L, Bomar Marilee, Bernt Beth, Wakefield Douglas S, Mehr David R
1 Curtis W. and Ann H. Long Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri School of Medicine , Columbia, Missouri.
Telemed J E Health. 2014 Mar;20(3):253-60. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0188. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
Prior telemonitoring trials of blood pressure and blood glucose have shown improvements in blood pressure and glycemic targets. However, implementation of telemonitoring in primary care practices may not yield the same results as research trials with extra resources and rigid protocols. In this study we examined the process of implementing home telemonitoring of blood glucose and blood pressure for patients with diabetes in six primary care practices.
Grounded theory qualitative analysis was conducted in parallel with a randomized controlled effectiveness trial of home telemonitoring. Data included semistructured interviews with 6 nurse care coordinators and 12 physicians in six participating practices and field notes from exit interviews with 93 of 108 randomized patients.
The three stakeholder groups (patients, nurse care coordinators, and physicians) exhibited some shared themes and some unique to the particular stakeholder group. Major themes were that practices should (1) understand the capabilities and limitations of the technology and the willingness of patient and physician stakeholders to use it, (2) understand the workflow, flow of information, and human factors needed to optimize use of the technology, (3) engage and prepare the physicians, and (4) involve the patient in the process. Although there was enthusiasm for a patient-centered medical home model that included between-visit telemonitoring, there was concern about the support and resources needed to provide this service to patients.
As with many technology interventions, careful consideration of workflow and information flow will help enable effective implementations.
先前关于血压和血糖的远程监测试验已表明,在血压和血糖目标方面有所改善。然而,在初级保健机构中实施远程监测可能无法产生与拥有额外资源和严格方案的研究试验相同的结果。在本研究中,我们考察了在6家初级保健机构中对糖尿病患者实施家庭血糖和血压远程监测的过程。
在进行家庭远程监测的随机对照有效性试验的同时,开展了扎根理论定性分析。数据包括对6家参与机构的6名护士护理协调员和12名医生进行的半结构化访谈,以及对108名随机分组患者中的93名进行的出院访谈的现场记录。
三个利益相关者群体(患者、护士护理协调员和医生)展现出一些共同主题以及一些特定利益相关者群体所特有的主题。主要主题为,医疗机构应(1)了解技术的能力和局限性以及患者和医生利益相关者使用该技术的意愿,(2)了解优化技术使用所需的工作流程、信息流和人为因素,(3)让医生参与并做好准备,以及(4)让患者参与该过程。尽管人们对包括就诊期间远程监测的以患者为中心的医疗之家模式充满热情,但对于向患者提供此项服务所需的支持和资源存在担忧。
与许多技术干预措施一样,仔细考虑工作流程和信息流将有助于实现有效实施。