Corrêa Cássia Bellotto, Margonar Rogério, Noritomi Pedro Yoshito, Vaz Luis Geraldo
Doctoral student, Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, São Paulo State University (UNESP), SP, Brazil.
Associate Professor, Department of Health Sciences, Implantology Postgraduation Course, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, São Paulo State University (UNESP), SP, Brazil.
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Apr;111(4):301-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.019. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
In dental rehabilitations that involve implants, the number of implants is sometimes smaller than the number of lost teeth. This fact can affect the biomechanical behavior and success of the implants.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanical behavior of different implant positions in the rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla.
Three-dimensional models of the maxilla were created based on computed tomography images for 3 different anterior prosthetic rehabilitations. In group IL, the implants were placed in the lateral incisor positions with pontics in the central incisor positions; in group IC, the implants were in the central incisor positions with cantilevers in the lateral incisor positions; and, in group ILIC, one implant was in a lateral incisor position and one was in a central incisor position, with a pontic and a cantilever in the remaining positions. A 150 N load was distributed and applied at the center of the palatal surface of each tooth at a 45-degree angle to the long axis of the tooth. The resulting stress-strain distribution was analyzed for each group.
The lowest displacement of the prosthetic structure was observed in group IC, although the same group exhibited the largest displacement of the bone tissue. In the bone tissue, the von Mises stress was mainly observed in the cortical bone in all groups. The maximum value of the von Mises stress shown in the cortical tissue was 35 MPa in the implant that neighbors the cantilever in group ILIC. The maximum von Mises stress in the trabecular bone was 3.5 MPa.
The prosthetic configuration of group IC limited the displacement of the prosthetic structure but led to greater displacement of the bone structure. The use of a cantilever increased the stress concentration in the implant and in the bone structure adjacent to the cantilever under the conditions studied here.
在涉及种植体的牙齿修复中,种植体的数量有时会少于缺失牙齿的数量。这一事实可能会影响种植体的生物力学行为和成功率。
本研究的目的是调查上颌前部修复中不同种植体位置的力学行为。
基于计算机断层扫描图像创建了上颌的三维模型,用于3种不同的前部修复。在IL组中,种植体位于侧切牙位置,桥体位于中切牙位置;在IC组中,种植体位于中切牙位置,悬臂位于侧切牙位置;在ILIC组中,一个种植体位于侧切牙位置,一个位于中切牙位置,其余位置为桥体和悬臂。在每个牙齿的腭面中心以与牙齿长轴成45度角的方向施加150 N的载荷。分析每组产生的应力-应变分布。
IC组中修复结构的位移最小,尽管该组骨组织的位移最大。在骨组织中,所有组的von Mises应力主要出现在皮质骨中。ILIC组中与悬臂相邻的种植体皮质组织中显示的von Mises应力最大值为35 MPa。小梁骨中的最大von Mises应力为3.5 MPa。
IC组的修复结构限制了修复结构的位移,但导致了骨结构更大的位移。在此研究的条件下,使用悬臂增加了种植体以及悬臂相邻骨结构中的应力集中。