School of Education, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China.
Center for Studies of Psychological Application and School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Feb;54:68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.015. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
Spatial position of an object can be represented in the human brain based on two types of reference frames: allocentric and egocentric. The perception/action hypothesis of the ventral/dorsal visual stream proposed that allocentric reference frame codes object positions relative to another object/background subserving conscious perception of the external world while egocentric reference frame codes object positions relative to the observer's body/body parts subserving goal-directed actions towards the objects. In three experiments of the present study, by asking congenitally deaf participants and hearing controls to perform allocentric and egocentric judgment tasks on the same stimulus set and by using the spatial congruency effect between allocentric and egocentric positions of the same target object to indicate the extent of influences between the two frames, we aimed to investigate whether the two frames and the potential interaction between them are altered after early deafness. Our results suggested that deaf participants' responses were significantly slower in the egocentric tasks as compared to hearing controls while the two groups showed comparable task performance in the allocentric tasks, indicating that egocentric reference frame was impaired after early deafness. Moreover, the pattern of interaction between the two frames was different between deaf and hearing groups: irrelevant egocentric positions caused more interference to allocentric processing than vice versa in the hearing group while the two frames caused equivalent interference to each other in the deaf group. Further control experiments suggested that the above effects were not caused by the impaired sense of balance in the congenitally deaf participants (via open-loop pointing test), and was independent of whether the speed of allocentric and egocentric processing was equivalent or not in the hearing group.
无参照系和自我参照系。腹侧/背侧视觉流的知觉/动作假说提出,无参照系编码相对于另一个物体/背景的物体位置,用于有意识地感知外部世界,而自我参照系编码相对于观察者的身体/身体部位的物体位置,用于朝向物体的目标导向动作。在本研究的三个实验中,我们要求先天性失聪参与者和听力对照组在相同的刺激集上执行无参照系和自我参照系判断任务,并使用相同目标物体的无参照系和自我参照系位置之间的空间一致性效应来指示两个框架之间的影响程度,旨在研究在早期失聪后,这两个框架及其潜在的相互作用是否发生改变。我们的结果表明,与听力对照组相比,失聪参与者在自我参照系任务中的反应明显较慢,而两组在无参照系任务中的表现相当,表明自我参照系在早期失聪后受损。此外,两个框架之间的相互作用模式在失聪组和听力组之间有所不同:在听力组中,无关的自我参照系位置对无参照系处理的干扰大于反之,而在失聪组中,两个框架对彼此的干扰相当。进一步的控制实验表明,上述效应不是由先天性失聪参与者平衡感受损引起的(通过开环指向测试),并且与听力组的无参照系和自我参照系处理速度是否相当无关。