Suppr超能文献

活体与已故供肝肝移植受者丙型肝炎疾病严重程度:一项扩展观察研究。

Hepatitis C disease severity in living versus deceased donor liver transplant recipients: an extended observation study.

机构信息

University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

Hepatology. 2014 Apr;59(4):1311-9. doi: 10.1002/hep.26920. Epub 2014 Mar 1.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Donor factors influence hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease severity in liver transplant (LT) recipients. Living donors, because they are typically young and have short cold ischemic times, may be advantageous for HCV-infected patients. Among HCV-infected patients in the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL) surviving >90 days and followed for a median 4.7 years, advanced fibrosis (Ishak stage ≥3) and graft loss were determined. The 5-year cumulative risk of advanced fibrosis was 44% and 37% in living donor LT (LDLT) and deceased donor LT (DDLT) patients (P = 0.16), respectively. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity at LT (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.38 for doubling of AST, P = 0.005) and biliary strictures (HR = 2.68, P = 0.0001) were associated with advanced fibrosis, but LDLT was not (HR = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.69, P = 0.63). The 5-year unadjusted patient and graft survival probabilities were 79% and 78% in LDLT, and 77% and 75% in DDLT (P = 0.43 and 0.32), with 27% and 20% of LDLT and DDLT graft losses due to HCV (P = 0.45). Biliary strictures (HR = 2.25, P = 0.0006), creatinine at LT (HR = 1.74 for doubling of creatinine, P = 0.0004), and AST at LT (HR = 1.36 for doubling of AST, P = 0.004) were associated with graft loss, but LDLT was not (HR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.49-1.18, P = 0.23).

CONCLUSION

Donor type does not affect the probability of advanced fibrosis or patient and graft survival in HCV-infected recipients. Thus, while LDLT offers the advantage of shorter wait times, there is no apparent benefit for HCV disease progression. Biliary strictures have a negative effect on HCV fibrosis severity and graft survival, and a high AST at LT may be an important predictor of fibrosis risk post-LT.

摘要

目的

研究供体因素对肝移植(LT)受者丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)疾病严重程度的影响。由于活体供体通常年轻且冷缺血时间短,因此可能对 HCV 感染患者有益。在成人对成人活体供肝移植队列研究(A2ALL)中,对存活时间超过 90 天且中位随访时间为 4.7 年的 HCV 感染患者进行了先进的纤维化(Ishak 分期≥3)和移植物丢失的检测。在活体供体 LT(LDLT)和已故供体 LT(DDLT)患者中,5 年累积先进纤维化风险分别为 44%和 37%(P=0.16)。LT 时天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)活性(AST 加倍的风险比[HR]为 1.38,P=0.005)和胆瘘狭窄(HR 为 2.68,P=0.0001)与先进的纤维化相关,但 LDLT 没有(HR 为 1.11,95%置信区间[CI]为 0.73-1.69,P=0.63)。LDLT 的 5 年未调整患者和移植物存活率分别为 79%和 78%,DDLT 分别为 77%和 75%(P=0.43 和 0.32),27%和 20%的 LDLT 和 DDLT 移植物丢失归因于 HCV(P=0.45)。胆瘘狭窄(HR 为 2.25,P=0.0006)、LT 时的肌酐(肌酐加倍的 HR 为 1.74,P=0.0004)和 AST(AST 加倍的 HR 为 1.36,P=0.004)与移植物丢失相关,但 LDLT 没有(HR 为 0.76,95%CI:0.49-1.18,P=0.23)。

结论

供体类型不会影响 HCV 感染受者的先进纤维化概率或患者和移植物存活率。因此,虽然 LDLT 提供了等待时间更短的优势,但对于 HCV 疾病进展没有明显的益处。胆瘘狭窄对 HCV 纤维化严重程度和移植物存活率有负面影响,LT 时高 AST 可能是 LT 后纤维化风险的重要预测指标。

相似文献

5
Is recurrent hepatitis C worse with living donors?
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2009 Jun;14(3):240-4. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e32832b1f1d.
7
Donor Risk Index for African American liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus.
Hepatology. 2013 Oct;58(4):1263-9. doi: 10.1002/hep.26478. Epub 2013 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

3
4
Living donor liver transplantation: eliminating the wait for death in end-stage liver disease?
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jun;14(6):373-382. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.2. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
5
Management of Hepatitis C Post-liver Transplantation: a Comprehensive Review.
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2015 Jun 28;3(2):140-8. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2015.00005. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
6
Defining long-term outcomes with living donor liver transplantation in North America.
Ann Surg. 2015 Sep;262(3):465-75; discussion 473-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001383.
7
Hepatitis C: New challenges in liver transplantation.
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 21;21(19):5768-77. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5768.

本文引用的文献

1
Progression of liver fibrosis in post-transplant hepatitis C: mechanisms, assessment and treatment.
J Hepatol. 2013 May;58(5):1028-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.12.014. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
2
Living donor vs. deceased donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatitis C virus-related diseases.
J Hepatol. 2012 Dec;57(6):1228-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.07.015. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
3
Results of live donor liver transplantation in patients with hepatitic C virus infection: the HCV 3 trial experience.
Clin Transplant. 2012 May-Jun;26(3):502-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01561.x. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
7
Liver transplantation in the United States, 1999-2008.
Am J Transplant. 2010 Apr;10(4 Pt 2):1003-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03037.x.
8
The impact of hepatitis C and biliary complications on patient and graft survival following liver transplantation.
Am J Transplant. 2009 Jun;9(6):1398-405. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02649.x. Epub 2009 May 20.
10
Whole liver versus split liver versus living donor in the adult recipient: an analysis of outcomes by graft type.
Transplantation. 2008 May 27;85(10):1420-4. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31816de1a3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验