Brunoni André R, Machado-Vieira Rodrigo, Zarate Carlos A, Vieira Erica L M, Vanderhasselt Marie-Anne, Nitsche Michael A, Valiengo Leandro, Benseñor Isabela M, Lotufo Paulo A, Gattaz Wagner F, Teixeira Antonio L
Center for Clinical and Epidemiological Research & Interdisciplinary Center for Applied Neuromodulation (CINA), University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation (SIN), Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine of University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Laboratory of Neuroscience (LIM27), Department and Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Laboratory of Neuroscience (LIM27), Department and Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Jul;24(7):1144-51. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation intervention that modifies cortical excitability according to the stimulation parameters. Preclinical and clinical studies in healthy volunteers suggest that tDCS induces neuroplastic alterations of cortical excitability, which might explain its clinical effects in major depressive disorder (MDD). We therefore examined whether tDCS, as compared to the antidepressant sertraline, increases plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels, a neurotrophin associated with neuroplasticity. Patients (n=73) with major depressive disorder were randomized to active/sham tDCS and sertraline/placebo (four groups) in this 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We measured BDNF plasma levels at baseline and endpoint, observing no significant changes of BDNF levels after treatment. In addition, no significant changes were observed in responders and non-responders as well as no relationships between BDNF levels and clinical and psychopathological variables related to depression. Thus, in one of the few placebo-controlled trials evaluating BDNF changes over an antidepressant treatment course, we did not observe BDNF increase regardless of clinical improvement in depressed patients. Regarding tDCS, BDNF plasma levels might not be a good candidate biomarker to evaluate depression improvement or be a predictor of response in patients treated with tDCS, as our results showed that BDNF increase was not necessary to induce clinical response. Finally, our findings do not support a relationship between BDNF and improvement of depression.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种非侵入性脑刺激干预措施,可根据刺激参数改变皮质兴奋性。对健康志愿者的临床前和临床研究表明,tDCS可诱导皮质兴奋性的神经可塑性改变,这可能解释了其在重度抑郁症(MDD)中的临床效果。因此,我们研究了与抗抑郁药舍曲林相比,tDCS是否会增加血浆脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)水平,BDNF是一种与神经可塑性相关的神经营养因子。在这项为期6周的双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,73名重度抑郁症患者被随机分为主动/假tDCS组和舍曲林/安慰剂组(四组)。我们在基线和终点测量了BDNF血浆水平,发现治疗后BDNF水平无显著变化。此外,在反应者和无反应者中均未观察到显著变化,BDNF水平与抑郁症相关的临床和精神病理变量之间也没有关系。因此,在为数不多的评估抗抑郁治疗过程中BDNF变化的安慰剂对照试验之一中,我们发现无论抑郁症患者的临床症状是否改善,BDNF水平均未升高。关于tDCS,血浆BDNF水平可能不是评估抑郁症改善情况的良好候选生物标志物,也不是tDCS治疗患者反应的预测指标,因为我们的结果表明,诱导临床反应并不一定需要BDNF升高。最后,我们的研究结果不支持BDNF与抑郁症改善之间存在关联。