Yadav Vikramaditya G, Stephanopoulos Gregory
Department of Chemistry&Chemical Biology, Harvard University, 12 Oxford St., Cambridge, MA 02138 (USA); Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 25 Ames St., Cambridge, MA 02139 (USA).
ChemSusChem. 2014 Jul;7(7):1847-53. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201301219. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
Research and development (R&D) expenditures by pharmaceutical companies doubled over the past decade, yet candidate attrition rates and development times rose markedly during this period. Understandably, companies have begun downsizing their pipelines and diverting investments away from R&D in favor of manufacturing. It is estimated that transitioning to continuous manufacturing could enable companies to compete for a share in emerging markets. Accordingly, the model for continuous manufacturing that has emerged commences with the conversion of late-stage intermediates into the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) in a series of continuous flow reactors, followed by continuous solid processing to form finished tablets. The use of flow reactions for API synthesis will certainly generate purer products at higher yields in shorter times compared to equivalent batch reactions. However, transitioning from batch to flow configuration simply alleviates transport limitations within the reaction milieu. As the catalogue of reactions used in flow syntheses is a subset of batch-based chemistries, molecules such as natural products will continue to evade drug prospectors. Also, it is uncertain whether flow synthesis can deliver improvements in the atom and energy economies of API production at the scales that would achieve the levels of revenue growth targeted by companies. Instead, it is argued that implementing metabolic engineering for the production of oxidized scaffolds as gateway molecules for flow-based addition of electrophiles is a more effective and scalable strategy for accessing natural product chemical space. This new paradigm for manufacturing, with metabolic engineering as its engine, would also permit rapid optimization of production variables and allow facile scale-up from gram to ton scale to meet material requirements for clinical trials, thus recasting manufacturing as a tool for discovery.
制药公司的研发支出在过去十年中翻了一番,但在此期间候选药物的淘汰率和研发时间却显著上升。可以理解的是,各公司已开始缩减其产品线,并将投资从研发转向制造。据估计,向连续制造转型可使公司在新兴市场中竞争份额。因此,已出现的连续制造模式始于在一系列连续流动反应器中将后期中间体转化为活性药物成分(API),随后进行连续固体加工以形成成品片剂。与等效的间歇反应相比,使用流动反应进行API合成肯定会在更短的时间内以更高的产率生产出更纯的产品。然而,从间歇配置转变为流动配置仅仅缓解了反应环境中的传质限制。由于流动合成中使用的反应目录是基于间歇化学的一个子集,天然产物等分子将继续避开药物探索者。此外,在能够实现公司目标收入增长水平的规模下,流动合成能否在API生产的原子经济性和能源经济性方面带来改进尚不确定。相反,有人认为实施代谢工程以生产氧化支架作为基于流动的亲电试剂加成的关键分子,是进入天然产物化学空间的一种更有效且可扩展的策略。这种以代谢工程为引擎的新制造模式还将允许快速优化生产变量,并允许从克规模轻松扩大到吨规模以满足临床试验的材料需求,从而将制造重塑为一种发现工具。