Qi Shiyong, Li Yanni, Liu Xu, Zhang Changwen, Zhang Hongtuan, Zhang Zhihong, Xu Yong
1 Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University , Tianjin, China .
J Endourol. 2014 Sep;28(9):1064-70. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0167. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
To evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and costs of percutaneous occlusive balloon catheter-assisted ureteroscopic lithotripsy (POBC-URSL) for large impacted proximal ureteral calculi.
156 patients with impacted proximal ureteral stones ≥1.5 cm in size were randomized to ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL), POBC-URSL, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) group between May 2010 and May 2013. For URSL, the calculi were disintegrated with the assistance of anti-retropulsion devices. POBC-URSL was performed with the assistance of an 8F percutaneous occlusive balloon catheter. PNL was finished with the combination of an ultrasonic and a pneumatic lithotripter. A flexible ureteroscope and a 200 μm laser fiber were used to achieve stone-free status to a large extent for each group. Variables studied were mean operative time, auxiliary procedure, postoperative hospital stay, operation-related complications, stone clearance rate, and treatment costs.
The mean lithotripsy time for POBC-URSL was shorter than URSL, but longer than PNL (42.6±8.9 minutes vs 66.7±15.3 minutes vs 28.1±6.3 minutes, p=0.014). The auxiliary procedure rate and postoperative fever rate for POBC-URSL were significantly lower than URSL and comparable to PNL (p<0.01, p=0.034). POBC-URSL was superior to URSL with regard to the stone clearance rate at 3 days postoperatively, and as good as PNL (98.1% vs 75.0% vs 96.2%, p<0.01). The postoperative hospital stay and hematuria rate were lower in POBC-URSL group than PNL group and similar to URSL group (p=0.016, p<0.01). The treatment costs were lowest in POBC-URSL group ($1205.0±$113.9 vs $1731.7±$208.1 vs $2446.4±$166.4, p=0.004).
For large impacted proximal ureteral calculi, POBC-URSL was associated with a higher stone clearance rate, fewer complications and costs. POBC-URSL combined the advantages of URSL and PNL.
评估经皮闭塞球囊导管辅助输尿管镜碎石术(POBC - URSL)治疗大型嵌顿性近端输尿管结石的临床疗效、安全性及成本。
2010年5月至2013年5月,将156例大小≥1.5 cm的嵌顿性近端输尿管结石患者随机分为输尿管镜碎石术(URSL)组、POBC - URSL组和经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)组。对于URSL组,结石在防反流装置辅助下粉碎。POBC - URSL组在8F经皮闭塞球囊导管辅助下进行。PNL组采用超声和气压弹道碎石器联合完成。每组均使用软性输尿管镜和200μm激光光纤以在很大程度上实现结石清除。研究的变量包括平均手术时间、辅助操作、术后住院时间、手术相关并发症、结石清除率和治疗成本。
POBC - URSL组的平均碎石时间短于URSL组,但长于PNL组(42.6±8.9分钟 vs 66.7±15.3分钟 vs 28.1±6.3分钟,p = 0.014)。POBC - URSL组的辅助操作率和术后发热率显著低于URSL组,与PNL组相当(p < 0.01,p = 0.034)。术后3天时,POBC - URSL组的结石清除率优于URSL组,与PNL组相当(98.1% vs 75.0% vs 96.2%,p < 0.01)。POBC - URSL组的术后住院时间和血尿率低于PNL组,与URSL组相似(p = 0.016,p < 0.01)。POBC - URSL组的治疗成本最低(1205.0±113.9美元 vs 1731.7±208.1美元 vs 2446.4±166.4美元,p = 0.004)。
对于大型嵌顿性近端输尿管结石,POBC - URSL具有更高的结石清除率、更少的并发症及更低的成本。POBC - URSL结合了URSL和PNL的优点。