Horch R E, Lang W, Arkudas A, Taeger C, Kneser U, Schmitz M, Beier J P
Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Erlangen University Hospital Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen‑Nuernberg FAU, Erlangen, Germany -
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2014 Apr;55(2 Suppl 1):265-72.
Treatment of severe wounds remains a surgical challenge in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). In some patients with end stage disease a combined arterial and venous vascular bypass together with immediate or subsequent free soft tissue transfer can become necessary to salvage the limb. The aim of this paper was to develop an algorithm of differential approaches of interdisciplinary reconstructions with bypasses and free flaps for leg salvage.
From our experiences with over 76 patients receiving a vascular bypass and a free microsurgical tissue transfer, we analyzed the various configurations of possible vascular constellations and treatment options. We derived an algorithm for the combined interdisciplinary surgical approach.
We found the surgical technique to be one of the main predictors for the final outcome and categorized the various options and vascular configurations in combination with free flaps to salvage extremities. The overall complication rate with more than 20% revisional surgeries is higher than in routine free flap transfer for reconstructions in patient without CLI. We observed 3 failures (4%) with complete flap loss and bypass occlusion and found 3 patients (4%) with initially successful reconstructions to have secondary amputations within 6 to 18 months postoperatively.
Given the multitude of concomitant diseases in patients with serious wounds and CLI the distinct choice of the individual reconstructive vascular/flap-procedure has to be thoroughly selected. Any treatment decision against revascularization must be made only with proper and adequate diagnosis based on proper and sufficient diagnostic imaging techniques following an interdisciplinary discussion of possible options for limb salvage. Based on our experience with a large series of this type of combined revascularization-flap reconstruction we developed a specific algorithm of surgical variants of bypass-free flap arterial and venous reconstructions that is presented in this paper.
对于严重肢体缺血(CLI)患者,严重伤口的治疗仍然是一项外科挑战。在一些终末期疾病患者中,可能需要进行动脉和静脉联合血管搭桥术,并立即或随后进行游离软组织移植以挽救肢体。本文的目的是制定一种用于腿部挽救的跨学科重建的差异化方法算法,该算法结合了搭桥术和游离皮瓣。
根据我们对76例以上接受血管搭桥术和游离显微外科组织移植患者的经验,我们分析了可能的血管组合和治疗选择的各种配置。我们得出了一种联合跨学科手术方法的算法。
我们发现手术技术是最终结果的主要预测因素之一,并对结合游离皮瓣挽救肢体的各种选择和血管配置进行了分类。超过20%的翻修手术的总体并发症发生率高于无CLI患者进行常规游离皮瓣移植重建的情况。我们观察到3例(4%)出现皮瓣完全丢失和搭桥闭塞的失败病例,并发现3例(4%)最初重建成功的患者在术后6至18个月内进行了二次截肢。
鉴于严重伤口和CLI患者存在多种伴随疾病,必须仔细选择个体重建血管/皮瓣手术的具体方案。任何反对血管重建的治疗决定都必须在对肢体挽救的可能选择进行跨学科讨论后,基于适当和充分的诊断成像技术进行适当和充分的诊断后做出。基于我们对大量此类联合血管重建-皮瓣重建的经验,我们制定了一种无搭桥皮瓣动脉和静脉重建手术变体的特定算法,本文将予以介绍。