Dr. O'Brien is assistant professor, Department of Medicine and Office of Research and Development in Medical Education, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California. Dr. Harris is professor and head, Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. Dr. Beckman is professor of medicine and medical education, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. Dr. Reed is associate professor of medicine and medical education, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. Dr. Cook is associate director, Mayo Clinic Online Learning, research chair, Mayo Multidisciplinary Simulation Center, and professor of medicine and medical education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
Standards for reporting exist for many types of quantitative research, but currently none exist for the broad spectrum of qualitative research. The purpose of the present study was to formulate and define standards for reporting qualitative research while preserving the requisite flexibility to accommodate various paradigms, approaches, and methods.
The authors identified guidelines, reporting standards, and critical appraisal criteria for qualitative research by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Google through July 2013; reviewing the reference lists of retrieved sources; and contacting experts. Specifically, two authors reviewed a sample of sources to generate an initial set of items that were potentially important in reporting qualitative research. Through an iterative process of reviewing sources, modifying the set of items, and coding all sources for items, the authors prepared a near-final list of items and descriptions and sent this list to five external reviewers for feedback. The final items and descriptions included in the reporting standards reflect this feedback.
The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) consists of 21 items. The authors define and explain key elements of each item and provide examples from recently published articles to illustrate ways in which the standards can be met.
The SRQR aims to improve the transparency of all aspects of qualitative research by providing clear standards for reporting qualitative research. These standards will assist authors during manuscript preparation, editors and reviewers in evaluating a manuscript for potential publication, and readers when critically appraising, applying, and synthesizing study findings.
许多类型的定量研究都有报告标准,但目前还没有针对广泛的定性研究的标准。本研究的目的是制定和定义定性研究的报告标准,同时保持必要的灵活性,以适应各种范式、方法和方法。
作者通过 2013 年 7 月之前在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Google 上搜索,查阅检索来源的参考文献列表,并联系专家,确定了定性研究的指南、报告标准和关键评价标准。具体来说,两位作者审查了一些来源,以生成一组可能对报告定性研究很重要的初始项目。通过审查来源、修改项目集以及对所有来源进行项目编码的迭代过程,作者准备了一份项目和描述的最终清单,并将该清单发送给五名外部评论员征求反馈意见。报告标准中包含的最终项目和描述反映了这一反馈意见。
《定性研究报告标准》(SRQR)由 21 个项目组成。作者定义并解释了每个项目的关键要素,并提供了最近发表的文章中的示例,说明如何满足这些标准。
SRQR 旨在通过提供定性研究报告的明确标准,提高定性研究各个方面的透明度。这些标准将有助于作者在准备手稿时、编辑和审稿人在评估潜在出版的手稿时,以及读者在批判性评价、应用和综合研究结果时使用。