Arrieta Alejandro, Woods John R, Qiao Nan, Jay Stephen J
From the Department of Health Policy and Management, Florida International University, Miami (A.A.); Indiana University Health Methodist Research Institute (J.R.W.), Indiana University School of Medicine (S.J.J.), and Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health (J.R.W., S.J.J.), Indianapolis; and Department of Economics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (N.Q.).
Hypertension. 2014 Oct;64(4):891-6. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03780. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
Home blood pressure (BP) monitoring has been shown to be more effective than clinic BP monitoring for diagnosing and treating hypertension. However, reimbursement of home BP monitoring is uncommon in the United States because of a lack of evidence that it is cost beneficial for insurers. We develop a decision-analytic model, which we use to conduct a cost-benefit analysis from the perspective of the insurer. Model inputs are derived from the 2008 to 2011 claims data of a private health insurer in the United States, from 2009 to 2010 National Health and the Nutrition Examination Survey data, and from published meta-analyses. The model simulates the transitions among health states from initial physician visit to hypertension diagnosis, to treatment, to hypertension-related cardiovascular diseases, and patient death or resignation from the plan. We use the model to estimate cost-benefit ratios and both short- and long-run return on investment for home BP monitoring compared with clinic BP monitoring. Our results suggest that reimbursement of home BP monitoring is cost beneficial from an insurer's perspective for diagnosing and treating hypertension. Depending on the insurance plan and age group categories considered, estimated net savings associated with the use of home BP monitoring range from $33 to $166 per member in the first year and from $415 to $1364 in the long run (10 years). Return on investment ranges from $0.85 to $3.75 per dollar invested in the first year and from $7.50 to $19.34 per dollar invested in the long run.
家庭血压监测已被证明在诊断和治疗高血压方面比诊所血压监测更有效。然而,在美国,家庭血压监测的报销并不常见,因为缺乏证据表明这对保险公司具有成本效益。我们开发了一个决策分析模型,用于从保险公司的角度进行成本效益分析。模型输入数据来自美国一家私人健康保险公司2008年至2011年的理赔数据、2009年至2010年的国家健康与营养检查调查数据以及已发表的荟萃分析。该模型模拟了从初次就诊到高血压诊断、治疗、高血压相关心血管疾病以及患者死亡或退出计划等健康状态之间的转变。我们使用该模型来估计家庭血压监测与诊所血压监测相比的成本效益比以及短期和长期投资回报率。我们的结果表明,从保险公司的角度来看,报销家庭血压监测在诊断和治疗高血压方面具有成本效益。根据所考虑的保险计划和年龄组类别,使用家庭血压监测估计的每位成员第一年净节省费用在33美元至166美元之间,长期(10年)在415美元至1364美元之间。投资回报率在第一年每投资1美元为0.85美元至3.75美元之间,长期为每投资1美元7.50美元至19.34美元之间。