Suppr超能文献

前列腺癌筛查与死亡率:欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)13年随访结果

Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up.

作者信息

Schröder Fritz H, Hugosson Jonas, Roobol Monique J, Tammela Teuvo L J, Zappa Marco, Nelen Vera, Kwiatkowski Maciej, Lujan Marcos, Määttänen Liisa, Lilja Hans, Denis Louis J, Recker Franz, Paez Alvaro, Bangma Chris H, Carlsson Sigrid, Puliti Donella, Villers Arnauld, Rebillard Xavier, Hakama Matti, Stenman Ulf-Hakan, Kujala Paula, Taari Kimmo, Aus Gunnar, Huber Andreas, van der Kwast Theo H, van Schaik Ron H N, de Koning Harry J, Moss Sue M, Auvinen Anssi

机构信息

Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Goteborg University, Goteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Lancet. 2014 Dec 6;384(9959):2027-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60525-0. Epub 2014 Aug 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The European Randomised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) has shown significant reductions in prostate cancer mortality after 9 years and 11 years of follow-up, but screening is controversial because of adverse events such as overdiagnosis. We provide updated results of mortality from prostate cancer with follow-up to 2010, with analyses truncated at 9, 11, and 13 years.

METHODS

ERSPC is a multicentre, randomised trial with a predefined centralised database, analysis plan, and core age group (55-69 years), which assesses prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in eight European countries. Eligible men aged 50-74 years were identified from population registries and randomly assigned by computer generated random numbers to screening or no intervention (control). Investigators were masked to group allocation. The primary outcome was prostate cancer mortality in the core age group. Analysis was by intention to treat. We did a secondary analysis that corrected for selection bias due to non-participation. Only incidence and no mortality data at 9 years' follow-up are reported for the French centres. This study is registered with Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN49127736.

FINDINGS

With data truncated at 13 years of follow-up, 7408 prostate cancer cases were diagnosed in the intervention group and 6107 cases in the control group. The rate ratio of prostate cancer incidence between the intervention and control groups was 1·91 (95% CI 1·83-1·99) after 9 years (1·64 [1·58-1·69] including France), 1·66 (1·60-1·73) after 11 years, and 1·57 (1·51-1·62) after 13 years. The rate ratio of prostate cancer mortality was 0·85 (0·70-1·03) after 9 years, 0·78 (0·66-0·91) after 11 years, and 0·79 (0·69-0·91) at 13 years. The absolute risk reduction of death from prostate cancer at 13 years was 0·11 per 1000 person-years or 1·28 per 1000 men randomised, which is equivalent to one prostate cancer death averted per 781 (95% CI 490-1929) men invited for screening or one per 27 (17-66) additional prostate cancer detected. After adjustment for non-participation, the rate ratio of prostate cancer mortality in men screened was 0·73 (95% CI 0·61-0·88).

INTERPRETATION

In this update the ERSPC confirms a substantial reduction in prostate cancer mortality attributable to testing of PSA, with a substantially increased absolute effect at 13 years compared with findings after 9 and 11 years. Despite our findings, further quantification of harms and their reduction are still considered a prerequisite for the introduction of populated-based screening.

FUNDING

Each centre had its own funding responsibility.

摘要

背景

欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)显示,在9年和11年的随访后,前列腺癌死亡率显著降低,但由于过度诊断等不良事件,筛查存在争议。我们提供了截至2010年的前列腺癌死亡率最新结果,并在9年、11年和13年进行了分析截断。

方法

ERSPC是一项多中心随机试验,有预定义的中央数据库、分析计划和核心年龄组(55 - 69岁),在八个欧洲国家评估前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测。从人口登记处识别出年龄在50 - 74岁的符合条件男性,并通过计算机生成的随机数将其随机分配至筛查组或不干预组(对照组)。研究人员对分组情况不知情。主要结局是核心年龄组的前列腺癌死亡率。分析采用意向性分析。我们进行了一项二次分析,校正了因未参与导致的选择偏倚。法国中心仅报告了9年随访时的发病率,未报告死亡率数据。本研究已在“当前对照试验”注册,注册号为ISRCTN49127736。

结果

在随访13年的数据截断时,干预组诊断出7408例前列腺癌病例,对照组为6107例。干预组与对照组前列腺癌发病率的率比在9年后为1.91(95%可信区间1.83 - 1.99)(包括法国为1.64[1.58 - 1.69]),11年后为1.66(1.60 - 1.73),13年后为1.57(1.51 - 1.62)。前列腺癌死亡率的率比在9年后为0.85(0.70 - 1.03),11年后为0.78(0.66 - 0.91),13年后为0.79(0.69 - 0.91)。13年时前列腺癌死亡的绝对风险降低为每1000人年0.11或每1000名随机分组男性中1.28,相当于每781名(95%可信区间490 - 1929)受邀筛查的男性中避免1例前列腺癌死亡,或每额外检测出27例(17 - 66)前列腺癌病例中避免1例死亡。校正未参与因素后,接受筛查男性的前列腺癌死亡率率比为0.73(95%可信区间0.61 - 0.88)。

解读

在本次更新中,ERSPC证实了PSA检测可大幅降低前列腺癌死亡率,与9年和11年的结果相比;13年时的绝对效果大幅增加。尽管有这些发现,但在引入基于人群的筛查之前,仍认为进一步量化危害及其减少情况是必要前提。

资助

每个中心有其自己的资助责任。

相似文献

2
Screening for prostate cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD004720. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004720.pub3.
3
7
Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):981-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113135.
8
Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1320-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810084. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
9
A 16-yr Follow-up of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
Eur Urol. 2019 Jul;76(1):43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
10
Design-corrected variation by centre in mortality reduction in the ERSPC randomised prostate cancer screening trial.
J Med Screen. 2017 Jun;24(2):98-103. doi: 10.1177/0969141316652174. Epub 2016 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

3
Noncancer-Related Mortality in Randomized Clinical Trials: A Meta-Analysis.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2526990. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.26990.
5
Prevalence and social inequalities in the use of cancer screening tests in Campinas, Brazil (ISACamp 2014/15).
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2025 Aug 4;28:e250043. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720250043. eCollection 2025.
6
EpiSwitch PSE Blood Test Reduces Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies: A Real-World Clinical Utility Study.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 29;17(13):2193. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132193.
7
Guideline of guidelines: a critical appraisal of the evidence for PSA retesting intervals.
BJU Int. 2025 Sep;136(3):372-384. doi: 10.1111/bju.16809. Epub 2025 Jul 3.
8
Regulation of 15-PGDH by ACSM1 in modulating PGE2 signaling and ECM remodeling in prostate cancer.
Med Oncol. 2025 Jun 28;42(8):297. doi: 10.1007/s12032-025-02866-3.
10
Introducing Preference Epidemiology: Improving Patient-Centered Approaches in Health Decision-Making.
Int J Public Health. 2025 May 15;70:1608617. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2025.1608617. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for prostate cancer: reflecting on the quality of evidence from the ERSPC and PLCO studies.
Recent Results Cancer Res. 2014;202:65-71. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-45195-9_8.
2
ERSPC, PLCO studies and critique of cochrane review 2013.
Recent Results Cancer Res. 2014;202:59-63. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-45195-9_7.
4
Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy.
Eur Urol. 2013 Dec;64(6):876-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.049. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
6
The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.
Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1778-86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
7
Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer: a final report from three decades of follow-up.
Eur Urol. 2013 Mar;63(3):428-35. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Oct 13.
8
Is repeat prostate biopsy associated with a greater risk of hospitalization? Data from SEER-Medicare.
J Urol. 2013 Mar;189(3):867-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
9
Quality-of-life effects of prostate-specific antigen screening.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 16;367(7):595-605. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1201637.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验