Reissmann Siegmund
Friedrich Schiller University, Biological and Pharmaceutical Faculty, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Dornburger Strasse 25, 07743, Jena, Germany; Jena Bioscience GmbH, Loebstedter Strasse 80, 07749, Jena, Germany.
J Pept Sci. 2014 Oct;20(10):760-84. doi: 10.1002/psc.2672. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
The penetration of polar or badly soluble compounds through a cell membrane into live cells requires mechanical support or chemical helpers. Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) are very promising chemical helpers. Because of their low cytotoxicity and final degradation to amino acids, they are particularly favored in in vivo studies and for clinical applications. Clearly, the future of CPP research is bright; however, the required optimization studies for each drug require considerable individualized attention. Thus, CPPs are not the philosopher's stone. As of today, a large number of such transporter peptides with very different sequences have been identified. These have different uptake mechanisms and can transport different cargos. Intracellular concentrations of cargos can reach a low micromole range and are able to influence intracellular reactions. Internalized ribonucleic acids such as small interfering RNA (siRNA) and mimics of RNA such as peptide nucleic acids, morpholino nucleic acids, and triesters of oligonucleotides can influence transcription and translation. Despite the highly efficient internalization of antibodies, enzymes, and other protein factors, as well as siRNA and RNA mimics, the uptake and stabile insertion of DNA into the genome of the host cells remain substantially challenging. This review describes a wide array of differing CPPs, cargos, cell lines, and tissues. The application of CPPs is compared with electroporation, magnetofection, lipofection, viral vectors, dendrimers, and nanoparticles, including commercially available products. The limitations of CPPs include low cell and tissue selectivity of the first generation and the necessity for formation of fusion proteins, conjugates, or noncovalent complexes to different cargos and of cargo release from intracellular vesicles. Furthermore, the noncovalent complexes require a strong molar excess of CPPs, and extensive experimentation is required to determine the most optimal CPP for any given cargo and cell type. Yet to predict which CPP is optimal for any given target remains a complex question. More recently, there have been promising developments: the enhancement of cell specificity using activatable CPPs, specific transport into cell organelles by insertion of corresponding localization sequences, and the transport of drugs through blood-brain barriers, through the conjunctiva of eyes, skin, and into nerve cells. Proteins, siRNA, and mimics of oligonucleotides can be efficiently transported into cells and have been tested for treatment of certain diseases. The recent state of the art in CPP research is discussed together with the overall scope, limitations, and some recommendations for future research directions.
极性或难溶性化合物穿过细胞膜进入活细胞需要机械支持或化学辅助剂。细胞穿透肽(CPPs)是非常有前景的化学辅助剂。由于其低细胞毒性以及最终降解为氨基酸,它们在体内研究和临床应用中特别受青睐。显然,CPP研究的前景光明;然而,针对每种药物所需的优化研究需要大量的个性化关注。因此,CPPs并非万灵药。截至目前,已经鉴定出大量具有非常不同序列的此类转运肽。它们具有不同的摄取机制,并且能够转运不同的货物。货物的细胞内浓度可达到低微摩尔范围,并能够影响细胞内反应。内化的核糖核酸,如小干扰RNA(siRNA)以及RNA模拟物,如肽核酸、吗啉代核酸和寡核苷酸三酯,能够影响转录和翻译。尽管抗体、酶和其他蛋白质因子以及siRNA和RNA模拟物能够高效内化,但将DNA摄取并稳定插入宿主细胞基因组仍然极具挑战性。这篇综述描述了各种各样不同的CPPs、货物、细胞系和组织。将CPPs的应用与电穿孔、磁转染、脂质转染、病毒载体、树枝状大分子和纳米颗粒(包括市售产品)进行了比较。CPPs的局限性包括第一代的细胞和组织选择性低,以及需要形成融合蛋白、缀合物或与不同货物的非共价复合物,以及货物从细胞内囊泡释放。此外,非共价复合物需要大量过量的CPPs,并且需要进行广泛的实验来确定针对任何给定货物和细胞类型的最优化CPP。然而,预测哪种CPP对任何给定目标是最优的仍然是一个复杂的问题。最近有一些有前景的进展:使用可激活的CPPs增强细胞特异性,通过插入相应的定位序列将药物特异性转运到细胞器中,以及药物通过血脑屏障、眼结膜和皮肤进入神经细胞。蛋白质、siRNA和寡核苷酸模拟物能够有效地转运到细胞中,并已针对某些疾病的治疗进行了测试。本文讨论了CPP研究的最新进展以及总体范围、局限性,并对未来的研究方向提出了一些建议。