Schwendicke F, Kern M, Blunck U, Dörfer C, Drenck J, Paris S
Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Prosthodontics, Propaedeutics and Dental Materials, Christian-Albrechts Universität, Kiel, Germany.
J Dent. 2014 Oct;42(10):1261-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
Selective caries removal involves sealing of carious dentine beneath restorations, which might decrease their marginal integrity and increase the susceptibility for secondary caries and microleakage. The present study compared these marginal characteristics of restorations in selectively and completely excavated teeth.
In 32 premolars, shallow and deep artificial lesions were created on pulpo-axial walls of mesial-distal-occlusal cavities, with mesial and distal margins located in enamel and dentine, respectively. Demineralised dentine was either removed or left before adhesively restoring the teeth (n=8), which were then submitted to thermo-mechanical cycling. The integrity of gingivo-cervical margins was assessed using scanning electron microscopy. In half of each margin, caries was induced adjacent to restorations using a continuous-culture biofilm model, and resulting lesions were evaluated using transversal microradiography. The other half of each margin was used to assess microleakage.
Integrity or microleakage of margins located in enamel did not differ significantly between groups, and bacterial biofilms did not induce distinct caries lesions in enamel. Dentinal margins in teeth with deep compared with shallow lesions showed a significantly higher proportion of marginal imperfections, gaps and microleakage (p≤0.05, Mann-Whitney/χ(2)-test). In contrast, neither marginal integrity nor microleakage differed significantly between completely and selectively excavated teeth (p>0.05). Dentinal mineral loss adjacent to restorations did not differ significantly between groups (p>0.80).
The marginal characteristics of restorations were affected by the depth of sealed or excavated lesions, but not by the performed caries excavation. This study did not find selective excavation detrimental for restoration integrity in vitro.
Selective excavation of deep lesions was shown to reduce pulpal risks, whilst leaving caries beneath restorations is feared to compromise the marginal characteristics of the subsequently placed restoration. Based on the present in vitro study, such assumptions cannot be supported.
选择性龋损去除涉及在修复体下方封闭龋坏牙本质,这可能会降低其边缘完整性,并增加继发龋和微渗漏的易感性。本研究比较了选择性和完全去除龋损的牙齿中修复体的这些边缘特征。
在32颗前磨牙的近远中咬合面洞的髓轴壁上制备浅、深人工龋损,近中边缘和远中边缘分别位于釉质和牙本质内。在粘结修复牙齿之前,去除或保留脱矿牙本质(n = 8),然后对牙齿进行热机械循环。使用扫描电子显微镜评估龈颈边缘的完整性。在每个边缘的一半,使用连续培养生物膜模型在修复体邻近处诱导龋病,并用横向显微放射摄影术评估产生的损害。每个边缘的另一半用于评估微渗漏。
位于釉质中的边缘的完整性或微渗漏在各组之间无显著差异,并且细菌生物膜未在釉质中诱导出明显的龋损。与浅龋损相比,深龋损牙齿的牙本质边缘显示边缘缺陷、间隙和微渗漏的比例显著更高(p≤0.05,Mann-Whitney/χ(2)检验)。相比之下,完全去除龋损和选择性去除龋损的牙齿之间的边缘完整性和微渗漏均无显著差异(p>0.05)。修复体邻近处的牙本质矿物质流失在各组之间无显著差异(p>0.80)。
修复体的边缘特征受封闭或去除龋损的深度影响,但不受所进行的龋损去除方式的影响。本研究未发现选择性去除龋损在体外对修复体完整性有害。
深龋损的选择性去除已被证明可降低牙髓风险,而担心在修复体下方保留龋损会损害随后放置的修复体的边缘特征。基于目前的体外研究,这些假设无法得到支持。