Zhang Xiaobo, Jiang Gaoli, Wang Libo, Liu Lijuan, Shi Peng, Wan Chengzhou, Qian Liling
Department of Pneumology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 201102, China.
Email:
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jul;52(7):525-30.
Body plethysmography is a typical method to measure functional residual capacity (FRC) and airway resistance (Raw). The aim of the study was to test the feasibility of measuring lung function with the body plethysmography in young children with acute lower respiratory tract infection (ALRI) by evaluating changes and prognosis of lung function for infants with ALRI with or without wheezing via body plethysmograph.
Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were performed by using body plethysmography in 444 children with ALRI, aged 1-36 months, to assess their tidal breathing parameters such as ratio of time to peak tidal expiratory flow to total expiratory time (TPTEF/TE), ratio of volume to peak tidal expiratory flow to total expiratory volume (VPTEF/VE), plethysmographic functional residual capacity (FRCP), FRCP per kilogram (FRCP/kg), specific effective airway resistance (sReff), effective airway resistance (Reff), Reff per kilogram (Reff/kg), etc. According to whether there was wheezing or not, children who had ALRI with wheezing were classified as Group-W, or without wheezing as Group-N. Changes or correlations of tidal breathing parameters and plethysmographic parameters were compared.One hundred and three contemporaneous healthy controls aged 1-36 months underwent the same tests for comparison. And 36 wheezing children accepted PFTs at follow-up in recovery phase.
Mean values of TPTEF/TE in Group-W,Group-N and the Control respectively were (20.5 ± 6.7)%,(22.8 ± 6.5)%,(34.6 ± 5.0)% (F = 110.500, P < 0.001), while VPTEF/VE respectively were (23.0 ± 6.3)%,(25.2 ± 6.8)%,(34.5 ± 4.2)% (F = 107.800, P < 0.001). Compared to the Control,Group-W and Group-N had significantly higher values of FRCP (226 vs. 176 vs. 172 ml, χ(2) = 64.870, P < 0.001), FRCP/kg(24.40 vs.17.80 vs.17.60 ml/kg,χ(2) = 68.890, P < 0.001), sReff(1.00 vs. 0.52 vs. 0.46 kPa·s,χ(2) = 75.240, P < 0.001), Reff (3.90 vs.2.74 vs.2.20 kPa·s/L, χ(2) = 36.480, P < 0.001) and Reff/kg [0.42 vs. 0.29 vs.0.22 kPa·s/(L·kg), χ(2) = 29.460, P < 0.001]. Although 25 (12.8%) wheezing children with ALRI had normal values of tidal breathing parameters, they already had increased FRCP, FRCP /kg, sReff, Reff and Reff/kg (t = 2.221, 1.997, 2.502, 2.587, 2.539, all P < 0.05). Values of FRCP and Reff in infants caught ALRI were inversely correlated to that of TPTEF/TE and VPTEF/VE (P < 0.05); 36 children with wheezing who accepted PFTs at follow-up had shown significant decline in the specific parameters of plethysmography such as FRCP, FRCP/kg, sReff, Reff and Reff/kg (Z = -1.999, -2.195, -2.038, -1.823, -2.054, all P < 0.05), while no improvement in the main parameters of tidal breathing such as TPTEF/TE.
Measuring lung function with the body plethysmography in young children with ALRI is feasible. FRC and Raw, as special lung function testing parameters of body plethysmography, were sensitive indicators reflecting impairment of lung function in infants with ALRI (especially for children caught ALRI with wheezing) and shows significant correlation with parameters from lung function testing via tidal breathing. Therefore plethysmography is worthy of clinical promotion.
体容积描记法是测量功能残气量(FRC)和气道阻力(Raw)的一种典型方法。本研究旨在通过评估急性下呼吸道感染(ALRI)伴或不伴喘息的婴幼儿肺功能的变化及预后,来测试体容积描记法在ALRI幼儿中测量肺功能的可行性。
对444例1至36个月的ALRI患儿进行体容积描记法肺功能测试(PFTs),以评估其潮气呼吸参数,如呼气流量峰值时间与总呼气时间之比(TPTEF/TE)、呼气流量峰值容积与总呼气容积之比(VPTEF/VE)、体容积描记功能残气量(FRCP)、每千克FRCP(FRCP/kg)、比有效气道阻力(sReff)、有效气道阻力(Reff)、每千克Reff(Reff/kg)等。根据是否有喘息,将有喘息的ALRI患儿分为W组,无喘息的分为N组。比较潮气呼吸参数和体容积描记参数的变化或相关性。103例1至36个月的同期健康对照者接受相同测试以作比较。36例喘息患儿在恢复期接受随访PFTs。
W组、N组和对照组的TPTEF/TE平均值分别为(20.5±6.7)%、(22.8±6.5)%、(34.6±5.0)%(F=110.500,P<0.001),而VPTEF/VE分别为(23.0±6.3)%、(25.2±6.8)%、(34.5±4.2)%(F=107.800,P<0.001)。与对照组相比,W组和N组的FRCP(226 vs. 176 vs. 172 ml,χ²=64.870,P<0.001)、FRCP/kg(24.40 vs.17.80 vs.17.60 ml/kg,χ²=68.890,P<0.001)、sReff(1.00 vs. 0.52 vs. 0.46 kPa·s,χ²=75.240,P<0.001)、Reff(3.90 vs.2.74 vs.2.20 kPa·s/L,χ²=36.480,P<0.001)和Reff/kg [0.42 vs. 0.29 vs.0.22 kPa·s/(L·kg),χ²=29.460,P<0.001]值显著更高。尽管25例(12.8%)有喘息的ALRI患儿潮气呼吸参数值正常,但他们的FRCP、FRCP/kg、sReff、Reff和Reff/kg已升高(t=2.221、1.997、