Otasowie John, Castells Xavier, Ehimare Umonoibalo P, Smith Clare H
Child and Family Service, Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust, Aconbury North, Worcester, UK, WR5 1JG.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 19;2014(9):CD006997. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006997.pub2.
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a chronic neurodevelopmental disorder of childhood onset, which may persist into adulthood. ADHD has a significant impact on a child's daily life, affecting relationships and academic performance. Its core symptoms include developmentally inappropriate levels of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsive behaviour. Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are sometimes used as second line of treatment in the reduction of ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents with ADHD. However, their efficacy is not yet known.
To assess the efficacy of TCAs in the reduction of ADHD symptoms within the broad categories of hyperactivity, impulsivity, and inattentiveness in young people aged 6 to 18 years with established diagnoses of ADHD.
On 26 September 2013, we searched CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, seven other databases, and two trials registers. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles, and contacted manufacturers and known experts in the field to determine if there were any ongoing trials or unpublished studies available.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including both parallel group and cross-over study designs, of any dose of TCA compared with placebo or active medication in children or adolescents with ADHD, including those with comorbid conditions.
Working in pairs, three review authors independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed trial quality. We calculated the standardised mean differences (SMD) for continuous data, the odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous data, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for both. We conducted the meta-analyses using a random-effects model throughout. We used the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool to assess the risk of bias of each included trial and the GRADE approach to assess the quality of the body evidence.
We included six RCTs with a total of 216 participants. Five of the six trials compared desipramine with placebo; the remaining trial compared nortriptyline with placebo. One trial compared desipramine with clonidine and placebo, and another compared two TCAs (desipramine and clomipramine) with methylphenidate and placebo. Of the six trials, one RCT primarily assessed the efficacy of TCA in children with ADHD and comorbid tic or Tourette disorder, and another one trial was in children with comorbid tic disorder. RCTs that met our inclusion criteria varied both in design and quality, and none were free of bias. The quality of the evidence was low to very low according to our GRADE assessments.TCA outperformed placebo regarding the proportions of patients achieving a predefined improvement of core ADHD symptom severity (OR 18.50, 95% CI 6.29 to 54.39, 3 trials, 125 participants, low quality evidence). In particular, there was evidence that desipramine improved the core symptoms of ADHD in children and adolescents as assessed by parents (SMD -1.42, 95% CI -1.99 to -0.85, 2 trials, 99 participants, low quality evidence), teachers (SMD -0.97, 95% CI -1.66 to -0.28, 2 trials, 89 participants, low quality evidence), and clinicians (OR 26.41, 95% CI 7.41 to 94.18, 2 trials, 103 participants, low quality evidence). Nortriptryline was also efficacious in improving the core symptoms of ADHD in children and adolescents as assessed by clinicians (OR 7.88, 95% CI 1.10 to 56.12). Desipramine and placebo were similar on "all-cause treatment discontinuation" (RD -0.10, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.04, 3 trials, 134 participants, very low quality evidence). Desipramine appeared more efficacious than clonidine in reducing ADHD symptoms as rated by parents (SMD -0.90, 95% CI -1.40 to -0.40, 1 trial, 68 participants, very low quality evidence) in participants with ADHD and comorbid tics or Tourette syndrome.Although this Cochrane Review did not identify serious adverse effects in patients taking TCAs, it did identify mild increases in diastolic blood pressure and pulse rates. Also, patients treated with desipramine had significantly higher rates of appetite suppression compared to placebo whilst nortriptyline resulted in weight gain. Other reported adverse effects included headache, confusion, sedation, tiredness, blurred vision, diaphoresis, dry mouth, abdominal discomfort, constipation, and urinary retention.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Most evidence on TCAs relates to desipramine. Findings suggest that, in the short term, desipramine improves the core symptoms of ADHD, but its effect on the cardiovascular system remains an important clinical concern. Thus, evidence supporting the clinical use of desipramine for the treatment of children with ADHD is low.
注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是一种起病于儿童期的慢性神经发育障碍,可能持续至成年期。ADHD对儿童的日常生活有重大影响,会影响人际关系和学业成绩。其核心症状包括与发育水平不相称的注意力不集中、多动和冲动行为。三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)有时用作治疗患有ADHD的儿童和青少年ADHD症状的二线药物。然而,其疗效尚不清楚。
评估TCA对已确诊ADHD的6至18岁青少年在多动、冲动和注意力不集中等大类症状中减轻ADHD症状的疗效。
2013年9月26日,我们检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库、Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL、其他七个数据库以及两个试验注册库。我们还检索了相关文章的参考文献列表,并联系了该领域的制造商和知名专家,以确定是否有正在进行的试验或未发表的研究。
随机对照试验(RCT),包括平行组和交叉研究设计,比较任何剂量的TCA与安慰剂或活性药物对患有ADHD的儿童或青少年的疗效,包括患有共病的患者。
三位综述作者两两合作,独立筛选记录、提取数据并评估试验质量。我们计算了连续数据的标准化均数差(SMD)、二分数据的比值比(OR)以及两者的95%置信区间(CI)。我们自始至终使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。我们使用Cochrane“偏倚风险”工具评估每个纳入试验的偏倚风险,并使用GRADE方法评估证据体的质量。
我们纳入了6项RCT,共216名参与者。六项试验中的五项比较了地昔帕明与安慰剂;其余一项试验比较了去甲替林与安慰剂。一项试验比较了地昔帕明与可乐定及安慰剂,另一项试验比较了两种TCA(地昔帕明和氯米帕明)与哌甲酯及安慰剂。在这六项试验中,一项RCT主要评估了TCA对患有ADHD合并抽动或图雷特综合征儿童的疗效,另一项试验针对患有共病抽动障碍的儿童。符合我们纳入标准的RCT在设计和质量上各不相同,且均存在偏倚。根据我们的GRADE评估,证据质量为低至极低。在实现ADHD核心症状严重程度预定义改善的患者比例方面,TCA优于安慰剂(OR 18.50,95%CI 6.29至54.39,3项试验,125名参与者,低质量证据)。特别是,有证据表明,根据家长评估,地昔帕明改善了儿童和青少年的ADHD核心症状(SMD -1.42,95%CI -1.99至-0.85,2项试验,99名参与者,低质量证据),根据教师评估(SMD -0.97,95%CI -1.66至-0.28,2项试验,89名参与者,低质量证据),以及根据临床医生评估(OR 26.41,95%CI 7.41至94.18,2项试验,103名参与者,低质量证据)。根据临床医生评估,去甲替林在改善儿童和青少年的ADHD核心症状方面也有效(OR 7.88,95%CI 1.10至56.12)。在“全因治疗停药”方面,地昔帕明和安慰剂相似(RD -0.10,95%CI -0.25至0.04,3项试验,134名参与者,极低质量证据)。在患有ADHD合并抽动或图雷特综合征的参与者中,根据家长评估,地昔帕明在减轻ADHD症状方面似乎比可乐定更有效(SMD -0.90,95%CI -1.40至-0.40,1项试验,68名参与者,极低质量证据)。虽然本Cochrane系统评价未发现服用TCA的患者出现严重不良反应,但确实发现舒张压和脉搏率有轻度升高。此外,与安慰剂相比,接受地昔帕明治疗的患者食欲抑制发生率显著更高,而去甲替林导致体重增加。其他报告的不良反应包括头痛、意识模糊、镇静、疲倦、视力模糊、出汗、口干、腹部不适、便秘和尿潴留。
关于TCA的大多数证据与地昔帕明有关。研究结果表明,短期内,地昔帕明可改善ADHD的核心症状,但其对心血管系统的影响仍是一个重要的临床关注点。因此,支持临床使用地昔帕明治疗ADHD儿童的证据质量较低。