Suppr超能文献

生物样本和数据共享国际原则宪章

International Charter of principles for sharing bio-specimens and data.

作者信息

Mascalzoni Deborah, Dove Edward S, Rubinstein Yaffa, Dawkins Hugh J S, Kole Anna, McCormack Pauline, Woods Simon, Riess Olaf, Schaefer Franz, Lochmüller Hanns, Knoppers Bartha M, Hansson Mats

机构信息

1] Center for Research Ethics and Bioethics Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden [2] Center for Biomedicine, EURAC Research, Bolzano, Italy.

Centre of Genomics and Policy, Mc Gill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Jun;23(6):721-8. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.197. Epub 2014 Sep 24.

Abstract

There is a growing international agreement on the need to provide greater access to research data and bio-specimen collections to optimize their long-term value and exploit their potential for health discovery and validation. This is especially evident for rare disease research. Currently, the rising value of data and bio-specimen collections does not correspond with an equal increase in data/sample-sharing and data/sample access. Contradictory legal and ethical frameworks across national borders are obstacles to effective sharing: more specifically, the absence of an integrated model proves to be a major logistical obstruction. The Charter intends to amend the obstacle by providing both the ethical foundations on which data sharing should be based, as well as a general Material and Data Transfer Agreement (MTA/DTA). This Charter is the result of a careful negotiation of different stakeholders' interest and is built on earlier consensus documents and position statements, which provided the general international legal framework. Further to this, the Charter provides tools that may help accelerate sharing. The Charter has been formulated to serve as an enabling tool for effective and transparent data and bio-specimen sharing and the general MTA/DTA constitutes a mechanism to ensure uniformity of access across projects and countries, and may be regarded as a consistent basic agreement for addressing data and material sharing globally. The Charter is forward looking in terms of emerging issues from the perspective of a multi-stakeholder group, and where possible, provides strategies that may address these issues.

摘要

对于提供更多获取研究数据和生物样本库的机会以优化其长期价值并挖掘其在健康发现与验证方面的潜力,国际上达成的共识日益增多。这在罕见病研究中尤为明显。目前,数据和生物样本库价值的不断提升并未伴随数据/样本共享及数据/样本获取方面同等程度的增长。跨国界相互矛盾的法律和伦理框架是有效共享的障碍:更具体地说,缺乏一个综合模式被证明是一个主要的后勤障碍。本宪章旨在通过提供数据共享应基于的伦理基础以及一份通用的材料和数据转移协议(MTA/DTA)来消除这一障碍。本宪章是不同利益相关者利益经过仔细协商的结果,它建立在早期的共识文件和立场声明之上,这些文件提供了总体的国际法律框架。此外,宪章提供了可能有助于加速共享的工具。制定本宪章是为了成为有效且透明的数据和生物样本共享的促进工具,通用的MTA/DTA构成了一种机制,以确保项目和国家之间获取的一致性,并且可以被视为全球处理数据和材料共享的一致基本协议。本宪章从多利益相关者群体的角度对新出现的问题具有前瞻性,并在可能的情况下提供了可解决这些问题的策略。

相似文献

1
International Charter of principles for sharing bio-specimens and data.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Jun;23(6):721-8. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.197. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
4
A review of the barriers to sharing in biobanking.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2013 Dec;11(6):339-46. doi: 10.1089/bio.2013.0039.
5
And Walls Shall Break: The ISBER 2016 Annual Meeting and Exhibits.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2016 Jun;14(3):260-1. doi: 10.1089/bio.2016.29006.djl.
6
International Data Sharing in Practice: New Technologies Meet Old Governance.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2016 Jun;14(3):231-40. doi: 10.1089/bio.2016.0002. Epub 2016 May 20.
7
Benefit sharing: an exploration on the contextual discourse of a changing concept.
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Sep 12;14:36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-36.
8
[Current modalities and concepts on access and use of biospecimen samples and associated data for research from human biobanks].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2016 Mar;59(3):317-24. doi: 10.1007/s00103-015-2293-4.
9
Biobanks for research. Ethical and legal aspects in human biological samples collections in France.
J Int Bioethique. 2012 Jun;23(2):165-72, 183-4. doi: 10.3917/jib.232.0165.
10
Legal and Ethical Implications of Data Sharing in International Biobanking Research: Toward a Global Response.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2016 Jun;14(3):193-4. doi: 10.1089/bio.2016.29003.amt. Epub 2016 May 19.

引用本文的文献

2
Communicating clearly about data sharing in genomics.
Hum Genomics. 2025 Jul 14;19(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40246-025-00784-z.
4
Ethical framework for FACILITATE: a foundation for the return of clinical trial data to participants.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 17;11:1408600. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1408600. eCollection 2024.
6
Overcoming ethical and legal obstacles to data linkage in health research: stakeholder perspectives.
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2023 Sep 25;8(1):2151. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2151. eCollection 2023.
7
Applying Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable Principles to Biospecimens and Biobanks.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2024 Dec;22(6):550-556. doi: 10.1089/bio.2023.0110. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
8
Computer-Aided Drug Design and Drug Discovery: A Prospective Analysis.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Dec 22;17(1):22. doi: 10.3390/ph17010022.
9
Sharing, reuse, and storage of biosamples among biomedical researchers in Jordan: Practice and concerns.
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 28;17(4):e0267552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267552. eCollection 2022.
10
Considerations for an integrated population health databank in Africa: lessons from global best practices.
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Aug 23;6:214. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17000.1. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Rare disease research: Breaking the privacy barrier.
Appl Transl Genom. 2014 Apr 18;3(2):23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.atg.2014.04.003. eCollection 2014 Jun 1.
2
A P3G generic access agreement for population genomic studies.
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 May;31(5):384-5. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2567.
3
Identifying personal genomes by surname inference.
Science. 2013 Jan 18;339(6117):321-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1229566.
4
Medical registries represent vital patient interests and should not be dismantled by stricter regulation.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;36(6):575-8. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
5
From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research.
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Apr 3;13(5):371-6. doi: 10.1038/nrg3218.
6
The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics research.
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2012;13:415-31. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-082410-101454. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
7
Ethics bureaucracy: a significant hurdle for collaborative follow-up of drug effectiveness in rare childhood diseases.
Arch Dis Child. 2012 Jun;97(6):561-3. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301175. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
8
Can Broad Consent be Informed Consent?
Public Health Ethics. 2011 Nov;4(3):226-235. doi: 10.1093/phe/phr020. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
9
Broad consent is informed consent.
BMJ. 2011 Nov 1;343:d6900; author reply d6901. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6900.
10
Bridging consent: from toll bridges to lift bridges?
BMC Med Genomics. 2011 Oct 4;4:69. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-4-69.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验