Zumsteg Zachary S, Spratt Daniel E, Romesser Paul B, Pei Xin, Zhang Zhigang, Polkinghorn William, McBride Sean, Kollmeier Marisa, Yamada Yoshiya, Zelefsky Michael J
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1275 New York, NY, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, New York, NY, USA.
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1009-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.028. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
The management of biochemical failure (BF) following external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer is controversial, due to both the heterogeneous disease course following a BF and a lack of clinical trials in this setting.
We sought to characterize the natural history and predictors of outcome for patients experiencing BF in a large cohort of men with localized prostate cancer undergoing definitive dose-escalated EBRT.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective analysis included 2694 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with EBRT at a large academic center. Of these, 609 experienced BF, defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir + 2 ng/ml. The median follow-up was 83 mo for all patients and 122 mo for BF patients.
INTERVENTION(S): All patients received EBRT at doses of 75.6-86.4 Gy.
The primary objective of this study was to determine predictors of distant progression at the time of BF. Cox proportional hazards models were used in univariate and multivariate analyses of distant metastases (DM), and a competing risks method was used to analyze prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM).
From the date of BF, the median times to DM and PCSM mortality were 5.4 yr and 10.5 yr, respectively. Shorter posttreatment PSA doubling time, a higher initial clinical tumor stage, a higher pretreatment Gleason score, and a shorter interval from the end of radiotherapy to BF were independent predictors for clinical progression following BF. Patients with two of these risk factors had a significantly higher incidence of DM and PCSM following BF than those with zero or one risk factor. The main limitations of this study are its retrospective nature and heterogeneous salvage interventions.
Clinical and pathologic factors can help identify patients at high risk of clinical progression following BF.
In this report, we look at predictors of outcome for patients with prostate cancer recurrence, as determined by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, following radiation treatment. We found that the approximate median times to distant metastasis and death from prostate cancer for patients in this situation were 5 yr and 10 yr, respectively. Furthermore, we found that patients with a rapid increase in PSA levels following treatment, a short time to PSA recurrence, invasion of extraprostatic organs, or a high Gleason score had worse outcomes.
前列腺癌接受外照射放疗(EBRT)后生化复发(BF)的管理存在争议,这是由于BF后的疾病进程异质性以及该情况下缺乏临床试验。
我们试图在一大群接受确定性剂量递增EBRT的局限性前列腺癌男性患者中,描述发生BF患者的自然病程及预后预测因素。
设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性分析纳入了在一个大型学术中心接受EBRT治疗的2694例局限性前列腺癌患者。其中,609例发生BF,定义为前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)最低点+2 ng/ml。所有患者的中位随访时间为83个月,BF患者为122个月。
所有患者接受75.6 - 86.4 Gy剂量的EBRT。
本研究的主要目的是确定BF时远处进展的预测因素。Cox比例风险模型用于远处转移(DM)的单因素和多因素分析,竞争风险方法用于分析前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)。
从BF之日起,至DM和PCSM死亡的中位时间分别为5.4年和10.5年。治疗后PSA加倍时间较短、初始临床肿瘤分期较高、治疗前Gleason评分较高以及从放疗结束至BF的间隔时间较短是BF后临床进展的独立预测因素。具有这些危险因素中的两个的患者在BF后发生DM和PCSM的发生率显著高于具有零个或一个危险因素的患者。本研究的主要局限性在于其回顾性性质和异质性挽救干预措施。
临床和病理因素有助于识别BF后临床进展高危患者。
在本报告中,我们研究了前列腺癌放疗后根据前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平确定的复发患者的预后预测因素。我们发现,这种情况下患者发生远处转移和前列腺癌死亡的中位时间分别约为5年和10年。此外,我们发现治疗后PSA水平快速升高、PSA复发时间短、前列腺外器官侵犯或Gleason评分高的患者预后较差。