Suppr超能文献

慢肺活量与用力肺活量之间的差异随体重指数增加而增大:低体重指数和正常体重指数时出现的矛盾差异。

The difference between slow and forced vital capacity increases with increasing body mass index: a paradoxical difference in low and normal body mass indices.

作者信息

Fortis Spyridon, Corazalla Edward O, Wang Qi, Kim Hyun J

机构信息

Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota

Pulmonary Function Test Laboratory, University of Minnesota Medical Center.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2015 Jan;60(1):113-8. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03403. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obesity reduces FVC, the most commonly used measurement of vital capacity (VC) and slow VC (SVC). It is unknown whether the difference between SVC and FVC is constant in different body mass indices (BMIs). We hypothesized that the difference between SVC and FVC increases as a function of BMI.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed pulmonary function tests (PFTs) that included spirometry and plethysmography and were performed in adults from January 2013 to August 2013. A total of 1,805 PFTs were enrolled. The non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare FVC with SVC, and to compare FEV1/FVC with FEV1/SVC ratio. Spearman correlation analysis was used to determine whether BMI has an effect on the discordance between FVC and SVC. Finally, we used the McNemar test for paired binary data to compare the prevalence rate of obstruction when using different measurements of VC.

RESULTS

In individuals with BMI < 25 kg/m(2) and no evidence of obstruction in the PFTs, FVC was larger than SVC (P = .03), whereas in overweight and obese individuals, SVC was significantly larger than FVC. The difference between SVC and FVC was positively correlated with BMI (P < .001). One hundred thirty-one patients had a normal FEV1/FVC but low FEV1/SVC ratio. Fifty of these 131 individuals also had a normal FVC; the majority of them (46 of 50) had the PFTs for investigation of respiratory symptoms and had BMI > 25 kg/m(2) (42 of 50).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that FVC is larger than SVC in patients with low and normal BMI and no evidence of obstruction in the PFTs, whereas FVC is smaller than SVC in overweight and obese individual. Our findings add to the existing literature that use of FEV1/FVC may lead to underdiagnosis of obstructive airway disease in overweight and obese individuals.

摘要

背景

肥胖会降低用力肺活量(FVC),这是肺活量(VC)和慢肺活量(SVC)最常用的测量指标。SVC与FVC之间的差异在不同体重指数(BMI)人群中是否恒定尚不清楚。我们假设SVC与FVC之间的差异会随着BMI的增加而增大。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2013年1月至2013年8月期间对成年人进行的包括肺量计和体积描记法的肺功能测试(PFT)。共纳入1805次PFT。采用非参数Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较FVC与SVC,以及比较FEV1/FVC与FEV1/SVC比值。采用Spearman相关性分析确定BMI是否对FVC与SVC之间的不一致有影响。最后,我们使用配对二元数据的McNemar检验比较使用不同VC测量方法时阻塞的患病率。

结果

在BMI<25kg/m²且PFT无阻塞证据的个体中,FVC大于SVC(P = 0.03),而在超重和肥胖个体中,SVC显著大于FVC。SVC与FVC之间的差异与BMI呈正相关(P < 0.001)。131例患者FEV1/FVC正常但FEV1/SVC比值较低。这131例患者中有50例FVC也正常;其中大多数(50例中的46例)因呼吸道症状接受PFT检查,且BMI>25kg/m²(50例中的42例)。

结论

我们的结果表明,BMI低且正常且PFT无阻塞证据的患者中FVC大于SVC,而超重和肥胖个体中FVC小于SVC。我们的研究结果补充了现有文献,即使用FEV1/FVC可能导致超重和肥胖个体阻塞性气道疾病的诊断不足。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验