Suppr超能文献

药物干预治疗糖尿病性神经痛:伞式系统评价和比较有效性网络荟萃分析。

Pharmacologic interventions for painful diabetic neuropathy: An umbrella systematic review and comparative effectiveness network meta-analysis.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2014 Nov 4;161(9):639-49. doi: 10.7326/M14-0511.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple treatments for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy are available.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of oral and topical analgesics for diabetic neuropathy.

DATA SOURCES

Multiple electronic databases between January 2007 and April 2014, without language restriction.

STUDY SELECTION

Parallel or crossover randomized, controlled trials that evaluated pharmacologic treatments for adults with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

DATA EXTRACTION

Duplicate extraction of study data and assessment of risk of bias.

DATA SYNTHESIS

65 randomized, controlled trials involving 12 632 patients evaluated 27 pharmacologic interventions. Approximately one half of these studies had high or unclear risk of bias. Nine head-to-head trials showed greater pain reduction associated with serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) than anticonvulsants (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.34 [95% credible interval {CrI}, -0.63 to -0.05]) and with tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) than topical capsaicin 0.075%. Network meta-analysis showed that SNRIs (SMD, -1.36 [CrI, -1.77 to -0.95]), topical capsaicin (SMD, -0.91 [CrI, -1.18 to -0.08]), TCAs (SMD, -0.78 [CrI, -1.24 to -0.33]), and anticonvulsants (SMD, -0.67 [CrI, -0.97 to -0.37]) were better than placebo for short-term pain control. Specifically, carbamazepine (SMD, -1.57 [CrI, -2.83 to -0.31]), venlafaxine (SMD, -1.53 [CrI, -2.41 to -0.65]), duloxetine (SMD, -1.33 [CrI, -1.82 to -0.86]), and amitriptyline (SMD, -0.72 [CrI, -1.35 to -0.08]) were more effective than placebo. Adverse effects included somnolence and dizziness with TCAs, SNRIs, and anticonvulsants; xerostomia with TCAs; and peripheral edema and burning sensation with pregabalin and capsaicin.

LIMITATION

Confidence in findings was limited because most evidence came from indirect comparisons of trials with short (≤3 months) follow-up and unclear or high risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

Several medications may be effective for short-term management of painful diabetic neuropathy, although their comparative effectiveness is unclear.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research.

摘要

背景

有多种治疗糖尿病性周围神经痛的方法。

目的

评估口服和局部镇痛药治疗糖尿病神经病变的疗效。

资料来源

2007 年 1 月至 2014 年 4 月间多个电子数据库,无语言限制。

研究选择

评估成人糖尿病性周围神经痛的药物治疗的平行或交叉随机对照试验。

数据提取

重复提取研究数据并评估偏倚风险。

数据综合

65 项随机对照试验涉及 12632 例患者,评估了 27 种药物干预措施。这些研究中约有一半存在高风险或不确定的偏倚。9 项头对头试验显示,与抗惊厥药(标准化均数差[SMD],-0.34[95%可信区间{CrI},-0.63 至-0.05])和三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)相比,血清素-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)可更有效减轻疼痛,与局部辣椒素 0.075%相比。网络荟萃分析显示,SNRIs(SMD,-1.36[CrI,-1.77 至-0.95])、局部辣椒素(SMD,-0.91[CrI,-1.18 至-0.08])、TCAs(SMD,-0.78[CrI,-1.24 至-0.33])和抗惊厥药(SMD,-0.67[CrI,-0.97 至-0.37])在短期疼痛控制方面优于安慰剂。具体而言,卡马西平(SMD,-1.57[CrI,-2.83 至-0.31])、文拉法辛(SMD,-1.53[CrI,-2.41 至-0.65])、度洛西汀(SMD,-1.33[CrI,-1.82 至-0.86])和阿米替林(SMD,-0.72[CrI,-1.35 至-0.08])比安慰剂更有效。不良反应包括三环类、SNRIs 和抗惊厥药引起的嗜睡和头晕;TCAs 引起的口干;普瑞巴林和辣椒素引起的外周水肿和灼热感。

局限性

由于大多数证据来自短期(≤3 个月)随访和偏倚风险不明确或高的试验的间接比较,因此对研究结果的信心有限。

结论

一些药物可能对糖尿病性周围神经痛的短期治疗有效,但它们的相对疗效尚不清楚。

主要资金来源

梅奥医学教育和研究基金会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验